July 02, 2026 01:53 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Ram Mandir donation theft: Six accused were employed by Varanasi-based security firm, probe reveals | Ayodhya Ram Temple donation theft: Probe says majority of money was allegedly stolen during Kumbh Mela | Commercial LPG price slashed by Rs 183.50 from July 1; check new rates in Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata and Chennai | Trump suffers major blow as US Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship | Delhi-Mumbai Expressway horror: Passenger bus goes up in flames after fatal collision, 8 dead | 'Dharmendra Pradhan will be responsible if anything happens': CJP warns as Sonam Wangchuk's health worsens on day 3 of hunger strike | Adani Ports seals $1.4 billion mega deal as MSC buys 49% stake in Vizhinjam port | Ram Temple donation scam: Former trust chief Champat Rai grilled by SIT for 2 hours, says report | Brazil escape Japan scare, Germany crash out as Paraguay script World Cup shocker | India overtakes Taiwan, South Korea to become world's fifth-largest equity market again
Book Row
The circulation and ordered seizure of NCERT Class 8 Social Science textbooks banned over a controversial chapter on the judiciary. Representational photo by ChatGPT

'Book withdrawn': NCERT apologises for controversial judiciary chapter after Supreme Court ban

| @indiablooms | Mar 10, 2026, at 01:51 pm

New Delhi/IBNS: The National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) on Tuesday issued an unconditional apology over a now-banned controversial chapter on judicial corruption in a Class 8 Social Science textbook.

The council withdrew the book two weeks after the Supreme Court imposed a blanket ban on its reprinting and online circulation.

In an official statement posted on X, NCERT said: “The Director and Members of NCERT hereby tender an unconditional and unqualified apology for Chapter IV. The entire book has been withdrawn and is not available.

“We sincerely regret the inconvenience caused and appreciate the understanding of all stakeholders. NCERT remains committed to maintaining the highest standards of accuracy, sensitivity, and responsibility in educational content.”

The top court had expressed dissatisfaction with NCERT’s initial response, noting the absence of a clear apology. The ban followed a suo motu case concerning the chapter titled “The Role of the Judiciary in Our Society.”

During the hearing, the bench led by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant sought accountability from both the central government and NCERT, warning that the matter would not be closed until those responsible were identified.

The court also directed authorities to seize all existing copies of the textbook and issued notices to the Centre and NCERT Chairman Professor Dinesh Prasad Saklani.

The Chief Justice remarked sharply on the seriousness of the issue, stating it affected the credibility and integrity of the judiciary, and stressed that “…heads must roll! We won’t close the case.”

Solicitor General of India Tushar Mehta, representing NCERT, faced strong observations from the bench regarding the circumstances that led to the inclusion of the controversial content.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.