July 02, 2026 01:53 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Ram Mandir donation theft: Six accused were employed by Varanasi-based security firm, probe reveals | Ayodhya Ram Temple donation theft: Probe says majority of money was allegedly stolen during Kumbh Mela | Commercial LPG price slashed by Rs 183.50 from July 1; check new rates in Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata and Chennai | Trump suffers major blow as US Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship | Delhi-Mumbai Expressway horror: Passenger bus goes up in flames after fatal collision, 8 dead | 'Dharmendra Pradhan will be responsible if anything happens': CJP warns as Sonam Wangchuk's health worsens on day 3 of hunger strike | Adani Ports seals $1.4 billion mega deal as MSC buys 49% stake in Vizhinjam port | Ram Temple donation scam: Former trust chief Champat Rai grilled by SIT for 2 hours, says report | Brazil escape Japan scare, Germany crash out as Paraguay script World Cup shocker | India overtakes Taiwan, South Korea to become world's fifth-largest equity market again
Supreme Court said mandatory menstrual leave could negatively impact women. Photo: ChatGPT.

‘Employers won’t hire women’: Supreme Court on mandatory menstrual leave plea

| @indiablooms | Mar 13, 2026, at 10:23 pm

Mandatory menstrual leave could negatively impact women’s employment prospects, Chief Justice of India Surya Kant said on Friday while hearing a petition seeking directions for states to introduce paid menstrual leave policies.

The Chief Justice warned that making such leave mandatory through legislation could discourage employers from hiring women.

“Creating awareness and sensitisation is different, but the moment you bring in a law mandating menstrual leave, nobody will hire them,” he said during the hearing.

“You don’t know the mindset of employers. They will not hire women if we make such a law.”

The court was hearing a petition filed by lawyer Shailendra Mani Tripathi seeking directions to state governments to frame rules allowing paid leave for women during menstruation, both for students and working professionals.

Chief Justice Surya Kant also said such a law could unintentionally create a perception that women are less capable than men in the workplace.

“It will create a psychological fear or impression among working women that they are ‘less’ than men,” he said.

Justice Joymalya Bagchi, who was part of the bench, also highlighted practical concerns from the perspective of employers.

“Affirmative action in respect of females is constitutionally recognised. But look at the practical reality in the job market. The more unattractive the human resource, the less is the possibility of assumption in the market,” he said.

Senior advocate MR Shamshad, appearing during the hearing, pointed out that the Government of Kerala had introduced menstrual leave for women students in state-run universities in 2013.

The decision was announced by Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan as part of the state’s commitment to building a “gender-just society”.

However, Chief Justice Surya Kant said such provisions work when implemented voluntarily but could have unintended consequences if made compulsory through law.

“The moment you say it is compulsory in law, nobody will give them jobs. Nobody will take them in judiciary or government jobs… their career is over,” he said.

Earlier this year, the Supreme Court of India recognised menstrual hygiene as an integral part of a girl child’s right to life, dignity, health and education under Article 21 of the Constitution.

A bench comprising Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan had also directed governments to ensure free sanitary napkins, gender-segregated toilets and menstrual health awareness campaigns.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.