November 23, 2024 05:36 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'Third World War has begun:' Ex-Ukraine military commander-in-chief Valery Zaluzhny | UK-India Free Trade Agreement negotiations to resume in early 2024 | UK can arrest Benjamin Netanyahu if he visits country based on ICC warrant | Centre to send over 10,000 additional soldiers to violence-hit Manipur amid fresh violence | Chhattisgarh: 10 Maoists killed during encounter with security forces in Sukma
No temple or dargah or gurudwara can obstruct public: Supreme Court
Bulldozer
Photo courtesy: Wikimedia Commons

No temple or dargah or gurudwara can obstruct public: Supreme Court

| @indiablooms | 01 Oct 2024, 12:49 pm

New Delhi/IBNS: The Supreme Court on Tuesday said no religious structure- be it temple or dargah or gurudwara- can obstruct public flagging the "secular" nature of the country, media reports said.

The court said its bulldozer action against any citizen will be given irrespective of religion.

The top court bench comprising Justices BR Gavai and KV Viswanathan said this hearing petitions challenging the bulldozer action against accused of crimes.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, who appeared for the states of Uttar Pradesh, Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh, said in the course of hearing that he was worried that the court was passing directions on the basis of a few precedents alleging that one community is in the target.

In response, the court said as quoted by NDTV, "We are a secular country and our directions will be for all, irrespective of religion or community. Of course, for encroachment we have said... if it is on a public road, footpath, water body or railway line area, it has to go, public safety is paramount.

"If there is any religious structure in the middle of the road, be it gurudwara or dargah or temple, it cannot obstruct public."

"For unauthorised construction, there has to be one law, it is not dependent on religion or faith or beliefs," Justice Gavai said.

Lawyer CU Singh, who was representing one of the petitioners, said he objects to the use of bulldozer action as a "crime-fighting measure".

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.