May 01, 2025 07:50 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Don't demoralise our forces: Supreme Court rejects plea seeking judicial probe into Pahalgam terror attack | PM Modi inaugurates WAVES, says right time to 'Create In India, Create For The World' | Kolkata fire: Hotel owner and manager arrested after blaze kills 14 | Pahalgam terror attack: US appeals to India and Pakistan to de-escalate border tensions | Pahalgam fallout: Instagram accounts of Mahira Khan, Hania Aamir, other Pakistani actors blocked in India | India shuts airspace for all Pakistani flights days after Pahalgam massacre | Bangladesh Supreme Court stays HC order granting bail to Chinmoy Krishna Das in sedition case | After Pahalgam terror attack, India warns Pakistan over 'unprovoked firing' along LoC: Report | PM Modi to skip Russia's Victory Day parade on May 9 in backdrop of Pahalgam attack | PM Modi holds top cabinet meetings amid India's wait for Pahalgam terror attack revenge
Image credit : UNI

Swami Chinmayanand case: SC Judge recuses herself

| @indiablooms | Mar 02, 2020, at 07:50 pm

New Delhi/UNI: Justice R Banumathi, one of the judges in the bench of Supreme Court, on Monday recused herself from hearing the plea filed by the girl's father against bail to Swami Chinmayanand and the petition, seeking transfer of the trial to Delhi.

"I recuse from hearing the case," Justice Banumathi said. She, however, refused to cite the reason for her recusal from hearing the case.

The survivor's father had moved the Supreme Court, seeking a direction to shift the trial from Uttar Pradesh to Delhi, on the ground that the accused is a powerful person and may influence the trial in the case.

Swami Chinmayanand is accused of raping a law student in Shahjahanpur. Police had earlier booked him in the case.

The Allahabad High Court had granted him bail, which was opposed and challenged by the father of the survivor, before the apex court.

The trial is going in Uttar Pradesh, as the case belongs to the state, but the girl and her family members wanted to shift the trial to Delhi, as they fear that they won't get justice there.

(Image credit : UNI)


 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.
Close menu