May 15, 2026 10:44 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
ECI announces third phase of SIR; Himachal, J&K, Ladakh excluded for now | Storm fury in Uttar Pradesh: Death toll rises to 89 as rain, gale-force winds leave trail of destruction | Congress ends 10-day suspense, names V.D. Satheesan as new Kerala CM | Delhi woman allegedly gang-raped inside sleeper bus; 2 arrested | Vijay-led TVK wins Tamil Nadu floor test as AIADMK split plays out | Congress veteran Sonia Gandhi admitted to Medanta Hospital in Gurugram | PM Modi halves convoy size after austerity call | Mulayam Singh's younger son Prateek Yadav dies at 38 | Protests erupt in Delhi after NEET UG 2026 cancellation over alleged paper leak | AIADMK cracks widen after Tamil Nadu defeat; faction backs Vijay-led TVK government

Tata Sons moves Supreme Court challenging Cyrus Mistry's reappointment as group's executive chairman

| @indiablooms | Jan 02, 2020, at 11:54 am

New Delhi/IBNS: Tata Sons on Thursday moved the Supreme Court challenging the National Company Appellate Tribunal's decision to reinstate Cyrus Mistry as the executive chairman of the group, media reports said.

In its petition, Tata Sons has sought a stay on the tribunal's order.

In its judgement, the tribunal on Dec 18 declared the appointment of N Chandrasekaran as the group's executive chairman as "illegal".

Mistry family Shapoorji Pallonji owns a minor 18 per cent stake in Tata Sons. He was removed as the chairman of the business conglomerate in what is called a coup in 2016. He had taken over in 2012 after Ratan Tata. He was later also removed from the board of Tata Sons.

Mistry had accused Tata Sons of mismanagement and as well operating the views of the minority stakeholders.

On the other hand, Tata Sons had rejected all the accusations.

The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) had rejected the petitions of two firms- Cyrus Investments Pvt Ltd and Sterling Investments Corp- challenging Mistry's removal.

Mistry had then approached the NCLAT, which entertained its petition and held a prolonged hearing.

In his defense, Mistry stated again and again that his removal was not in compliance with the Companies Act and there is gross mismanagement across the conglomerate.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.