UN agencies release guidelines for countries on pesticide legislation and labelling
“Despite the very significant progress achieved since the original promulgation of the Code, many national frameworks for managing pesticides are in need of upgrades to face today's challenges,” said Ren Wang, FAO Assistant Director-General for Agriculture and Consumer Safety, in a press release.
According to the agency, much more is now known about the long-term health and environmental effects of pesticides, new international agreements have been put in place and it is broadly recognised that poor pesticide management can have negative effects on trade in agricultural produce.
Pesticide legislation formulated in the 80s and 90s needs a health check-up to ensure that countries are effectively protecting people and the environment, Wang warned.
Globally, the use of pesticides has continued to grow over the past three decades, he further noted. Industry data suggest that the size of the global pesticide market has doubled over the past 15 years and currently exceeds $50 billion in annual sales.
To help address these challenges, FAO and the World Health Organization (WHO) have now released a pair of updated guidelines on pesticide legislation and labelling that take into account new developments and concerns.
The revised guidelines explain in detail the elements of a sound national pesticide legal framework, which the UN agencies say serve as a reference point for governments that are reviewing or updating existing pesticide legislation or drafting it from scratch.
Meanwhile, an overhauled set of Guidelines is targeted to pesticide regulatory authorities – primarily in developing countries and countries with economies in transition – which are creating or revising national pesticide labelling requirements.
A critical element in protecting human health and avoiding negative environmental impacts, pesticide labels explain how to use products correctly and legally, describe potential hazards and precautionary measures, and give instructions on responding to poisonings or spills, the UN agencies highlighted.
“FAO encourages all countries to take these guidelines into consideration when reviewing their current pesticide legislation and labelling regimes, with an aim to better protect human health and the environment and to make agriculture more sustainable,” Wang said.
“The 1985 International Code of Conduct on the Distribution and Use of Pesticides helped bring much needed order to a ‘Wild West situation,’ in which many countries did not yet have legislation for the control of pesticides, and health- and environmental problems stemming from their misuse were rampant,” he continued.
He added, “Those who paid the steepest price were millions of poor farmers lacking access to information, training, and proper means of protection.”
The Code – renamed the Code of Conduct on Pesticide Management and updated several times, most recently in 2013 – along with a series of supporting FAO guidelines, policy work, and field programs has provided an international reference framework on the control of pesticides for governments and the private sector alike.
FAO highlighted that on Wednesday, nearly all countries have pesticide legislation in place and products generally are better labelled, adding that the most acutely toxic pesticides have been removed from the market in many countries, and alternative approaches to the use of chemicals in agriculture – such as Integrated Pest Management, which emphasizes natural methods to control and prevent pests and diseases – are increasingly becoming mainstream.
Yet despite this important progress, the agency said much remains to be done. FAO will be prioritizing support to countries to strengthen their capacity to enforce pesticide legislation and promote integrated pest management to reduce reliance on pesticides.
The agency will also provide guidance to governments to help them review their national list of authorized pesticides in order to identify highly hazardous pesticides that require special attention, for instance because the manner in which they are commonly used in the country may pose elevated risks to health or the environment.
Photo: FAO/Danfung Dennis/www.justearthnews.com
Support Our Journalism
We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism
IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.
