August 05, 2026 04:23 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
No rate cut! RBI keeps repo rate unchanged, sees 6.7% growth but warns inflation will rise | Free laptops, AI training, internships: Vijay government unveils youth-centric Tamil Nadu budget | Bangladesh asks media not to broadcast Sheikh Hasina's speech ahead of first public appearance from India | Kejriwal marches to PM Modi's residence over E20 petrol, alleges 'Trump pressure' behind policy | DMK slams Vijay government over Udhayanidhi's arrest, calls it 'blatant cowardice' | Tamil Nadu political storm: Udhayanidhi Stalin arrested after Trisha remark row | Faridabad teacher stabbed 34 times in 30 seconds at school gate; shocking CCTV details emerge | 'It was a conspiracy': Brij Bhushan reacts after acquittal in wrestlers' sexual harassment case | After NEET protests, CJP backs Jharkhand students' agitation over alleged JPSC-JSSC exam irregularities | Brij Bhushan acquitted: Delhi Court clears ex-WFI chief in high-profile wrestlers' sexual harassment case

#MeToo: Alok Nath granted anticipatory bail in rape case filed by Vinta Nanda

| @indiablooms | Jan 05, 2019, at 11:13 pm

New Delhi, Jan 5 (IBNS): The Dindoshi Sessions Court on Saturday granted an anticipatory bail to actor Alok Nath, who was accused of rape by writer-producer Vinta Nanda in the wake of the #MeToo movement in Bollywood last year, media reports said.

Nanda alleged she was drugged and raped by the actor 19 years ago when they were working together in a TV show.

The victim had first made the allegations against Nath on Facebook on October 8.

In the post, she claimed her drink was spiked by the actor at his house during a party. She said that when she left his house feeling uneasy, Nath had offered to drop her home in his car, but instead took her to another location where he allegedly raped her.

After the victim’s post, Nath’s wife Ashu Singh had submitted a complaint seeking an FIR against the victim for defamation.

A week later, Nath filed civil defamation case seeking Re 1 as damages. This was, however, dismissed by the Bombay City Civil and Sessions Court which found that neither of them could claim to have been defamed by the Facebook post.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.