January 23, 2026 03:35 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'Bigger than tariffs': Ex-IMF economist Gita Gopinath flags pollution as India’s biggest economic threat | SC allows both Hindus and Muslims to pray at disputed Bhojshala in Madhya Pradesh on Basant Panchami | 'Second group? no chance': Ashwini Vaishnaw says India is a top AI power, slams IMF at Davos | Twist before Tamil Nadu polls! TTV Dhinakaran returns to NDA after bitter exit | Gold goes berserk! Prices smash all-time high as global tensions explode | Markets end in red: Sensex slips 271 points, Nifty below 25,200; rupee hits record low | Nitin Nabin becomes BJP’s youngest president ahead of key assembly polls, PM Modi calls him ‘my boss’ | Viral video scandal rocks Karnataka Police: DGP Ramachandra Rao suspended | Jolt to ECI over SIR! SC allows BLAs at hearing, questions 'logical discrepancy'; TMC declares 'BJP's game over' | Will dal disrupt diplomacy? US lawmakers urge Trump to act on India’s 30% pulse tariff
Sedition Law

Supreme Court pauses controversial sedition law until review in historic verdict

| @indiablooms | May 11, 2022, at 07:24 pm

New Delhi/IBNS: In a historic judgement, the Supreme Court Wednesday paused colonial era's controversial sedition law until its review by the government, media reports said.

After the verdict, now hundreds who are charged under the law can now approach court for bail.

Responding to the pleas which challenged the law alleging its misuse in many cases, the top court said no new First Information Report (FIR) will be filed and all pending cases will be hold at a time the government reviews the Act. 

Chief Justice of India (CJI) NV Ramana said as quoted by NDTV, "It will be appropriate not to use this provision of law till further re-examination is over.

"We hope and expect that centre and state will desist from registering any FIR under 124 A (sedition law) or initiate proceeding under the same till re-examination is over."

"The Union of India is at liberty to pass directives to states to prevent misuse of the law," the CJI added. 

Though the government Monday announced its decision to review the law, it had argued that the Act should not be paused. 

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, who was representing the government, said as quoted by NDTV, "There has to be a layer of scrutiny, where a responsible officer is there to scrutinise the gravity of the situation and there of course would be judicial forums."

Welcoming the order, Congresss spokesperson Randeep Singh Surjewala, tweeted, "Speaking “truth to power” is not #Sedition but true Nationalism!.."

Calling the judgement "victory", Trinamool Congress (TMC) MP Mahua Moitra tweeted, "Supreme Court stays Sec 124A- no new cases can be filed, existing cases can apply for bail & release immediately.

"Thank you to my lawyer Sr. Advocate Gopal Sankaranarayan for his 1 pager which swung the day!"

 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.