August 09, 2026 08:29 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
‘A morning I will cherish’: Raghav Chadha meets PM Modi, shares photos from ‘enriching’ meeting | Delhi Mercedes crash kills 70-year-old woman: Cop’s son behind wheel, beer bottle found | Indian-origin woman accused of ‘visa fraud’ on X: US Attorney steps in with major clarification | US Senate passes Russia sanctions bill: India can face Trump’s 100% tariff threat | Expired meat, rotten vegetables found at Bengaluru's luxury hotels, legal action begins | 'I'm ready to be humiliated': Vijay, Udhayanidhi Stalin clash in Tamil Nadu Assembly over Cauvery dispute | 'They don't need Mohan Bhagwat's certificate': Priyanka Gandhi Vadra's sharp reply to RSS chief's Gen Z remark | 'Students, Gen Z, ask me anything': Rahul Gandhi launches Instagram Q&A, responds to Jharkhand protest | PM Modi goes Gen Z, urges Indians to share 'Get Ready With Me' videos on National Handloom Day | Former Tehelka editor Tarun Tejpal sentenced to 10-year jail term in 2013 rape case as Bombay HC overturns acquittal

Uma Bharti misleading nation over Farakka Barrage, Bihar minister says

| | May 20, 2017, at 03:35 pm
New Delhi, May 20 (IBNS): Bihar’s Water Resources Minister Rajiv Ranjan Singh slammed Union Water Resources Minister Uma Bharti on Friday for her claims that Farakka Barrage was not a “problem".

The Bihar lawmaker was armed with expert recommendation to consider decommissioning of Farakka Barrage as a possible alternative to address the sedimentation problem in river Ganga.

The said recommendation in the form of Delhi Declaration was made by water experts from reputed institutions such as IITs, National Institute of Hydrology, NEERI, at the conclusion of a two-day conference on “Sedimentation, A colossal impediment to incessant flow of river Ganga – Problems and Solutions”, organized by his ministry  in New Delhi on May 18-19, where the experts unanimously adopted the Delhi Declaration.

Bihar CM Nitish Kumar was present at the Conference on May 18.

“Before making such a sweeping statement Uma ji did not even bother to consult the Bihar government on the contentious issue,” Singh said.

Uma Bharti in a recent interview to The Hindu newspaper, had reportedly stated “Farakka Barrage is not the problem … I have had experts look at it…Once the waterway on the Ganga begins, developers will dredge the silt and (Transport Minister) Nitin Gadkari will find creative ways to use that, too.”

However, during the two-day conference, experts that included Prof Nayan Sharma of IIT, Roorkee, Prof. Rajiv Sinha of IIT Kanpur, Dr. Rakesh Kumar, Director, National Environmental Engineering Research Institute(NEERI), besides Magsaysay Winner Dr. Rajendra Singh among others, claimed:

i) a time-bound comprehensive study was required concerning siltation and its ill-effects due to Farakka barrage

ii) water ways were not removing silt and that dredging silt would not work as silt will come back.

The experts were unanimously of the view that “Dredging of National Waterways-1 is increasing erosion in Bihar. The project should be put on hold until a scientific study of impact of dredging on erosion is done”.

The consensus was that without the incessant flow of Ganga, it was not possible to make the river clean and therefore, instead of ‘keeping the silt away’; the strategy of ‘giving the silt its way’ should be adopted.

Attacking Bharti, Singh said since the National Inland Waterway on Ganga  would require construction of several more barrages on the river, “that would not just disturb its incessant flow, but would also convert the river into several small ponds”.

(Reporting by Deepak Parvatiyar)
 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.