August 15, 2026 06:51 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Ajit Doval breaks silence on Operation Sindoor in Discovery’s explosive new docuseries | Rahul Gandhi's 'mock hug' taunt sparks row; Centre stresses 'mutual respect' with Italy | Delhi on high alert: Bomb threat to High Court, airport and multiple locations ahead of I-Day | ‘Who are they to interfere?’: CJI Surya Kant slams Bar Council of India over NALSAR students’ enrolment row | 'Shows how low Congress has sunk': BJP slams Rahul Gandhi over Modi foreign policy jibe | From guns to glamour: Former women Maoists walk the ramp in Chhattisgarh | Netaji row: Suvendu Adhikari govt strips BJP MP Anant Maharaj of state honour | Sukhbir Badal attacked by Nihang Sikh with kirpan at Maharashtra gurdwara; assailant detained | ‘If you cannot do it, we will pass an order’: Supreme Court’s final warning to Centre on food labels | ‘Time to move on’: Bombay HC sends strong message in Vijay Mallya-bank dispute

Views of states, Centre should be considered for appointment of judges : Supreme Court

| | Dec 16, 2015, at 06:52 pm
New Delhi, Dec 16 (IBNS) The Supreme Court on Wednesday ordered that views of state governments and Centre should be one of the criteria for appointment of judges in higher judiciary, reports said.

The apex court said that Memorandum of Proceedings (MOP) on appointment of judges in higher judiciary should be in consultation with the Centre and Chief Justice of India.

"Transparency is most important in the appointment of judges for higher judiciary and it should be reflected in the MoP. The MOP should also clearly contain eligibility criteria like minimum age etc. as guidance for appointment of judges of high court and Supreme Court," the court said.

The court said that minutes of collegium proceedings have to be recorded giving details of dissent, if any, but confidentiality of selection process has to be maintained.

Refusing to toe the Supreme Court observation,  the Centre had refused to formulate draft memorandum of procedure to be followed by the collegium for appointment of judges to Supreme Court and High Courts.

The Supreme Court had asked the Centre to formulate memorandum of procedure for the collegium reforms.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.