June 28, 2026 07:31 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Fresh paper leak rocks India: Maharashtra TET postponed a day before exam, over 4 lakh aspirants affected | Pune fort murder case: Siya Goyal's brother says family would have called off marriage if she had objected | Donald Trump gets a road named after him in India, says 'Thank You!' | Fresh setback for Gautam Adani? US judge asks DoJ to justify dropping criminal charges | Ram Mandir Trust chief Champat Rai resigns as alleged donation siphoning row escalates | Ram Mandir fund row deepens: 8 arrested days after BJP called allegations 'false narrative' | 'Who tied the hands of CBI?': Calcutta HC on RG Kar case; victim's mother, now BJP MLA, says she is 'deeply disturbed' | Construction comes to a standstill at nearly 700 Kolkata projects after Taratala warehouse tragedy kills 15 | World Cup shocker! Ecuador stun Germany 2-1, storm into Round of 32 | Iran-US conflict: Cargo vessel hit near Strait of Hormuz, UN agency pauses evacuation operations
Shiv Sena
Image Credit: Facebook/Eknath Shinde

Supreme Court to decide on Shiv Sena election symbol on Sep 27

| @indiablooms | Sep 07, 2022, at 07:17 pm

New Delhi/UNI: The Supreme Court Wednesday said that it will consider on Sept 27 whether the Election Commission should proceed to decide which faction of the Shiv Sena should have the claim to the "bow and arrow" election symbol.

Both the groups, led by former Maharashtra Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray and incumbent Chief Minister Eknath Shinde, have staked claim over the symbol.

A five-judge Constitution Bench headed by Justice Dr D Y Chandrachud made the observation.

It asked all the parties as well as the Election Commission to file brief notes not exceeding three pages ahead of the hearing.

Senior lawyer Arvind Datar, appearing for the poll panel, said that under the Symbols Act, if there was a complaint, notice had to be issued to all the parties. He added that the process takes a lot of time.

The Constitution Bench also comprised Justices M.R. Shah, Krishna Murari, Hima Kohli and P.S. Narasimha.

Senior advocate Neeraj Kishan Kaul, appearing for the Shinde group, submitted that the Election Commission cannot be prevented from taking a decision. He said the urgency was because of the impending local body elections.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for the Thackeray group, said the August 3 order of the Supreme Court had granted liberty to Uddhav Thackeray and his supporters to seek time.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.