September 26, 2026 05:49 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'Asif bhai gun nikal': 17-year-old's chilling account of men posing as cops raping her in South Delhi park | Indian passport rules changed: New validity, fees for children and adults explained | 'Terrorism by Pakistan will have consequences': India issues blunt warning at UNGA | Trouble for Gyanesh Kumar? Plea filed in Supreme Court seeking prosecution of CEC | Air India pilot suspended after failing alcohol test before Zurich-Delhi flight, weeks after marijuana case | 'Don't be selective, boycott all elections': CJP's Abhijeet Dipke's blunt message to Opposition | 'Resign by tomorrow or face nationwide protest from October 2': CJP's Abhijeet Dipke's fresh warning to Gyanesh Kumar | 'Locked' iPhone 17 at centre of mystery surrounding IIT Bombay student's death | 'Rahul Gandhi is devoid of wisdom and knowledge': BJP hits back over 'vote theft' claim | ‘How does anti-incumbency disappear?’: Rahul Gandhi targets Modi, Shah in fresh ‘vote chori’ attack, demands Gyanesh Kumar’s resignation
Ford
Ford rehires veteran engineers. Photo: Unsplash

AI couldn't replace humans: Ford rehires veteran engineers in major U-turn

| @indiablooms | Jun 30, 2026, at 10:09 am

US auto giant Ford has rehired experienced human engineers after finding that Artificial Intelligence failed to match their expertise in vehicle design and quality assurance, according to media reports.

Like many companies across industries, Ford had integrated AI into parts of its operations, including quality checks, in an effort to improve efficiency.

Explaining the decision to bring veteran engineers back into the process, Charles Poon, Ford's vice president of vehicle hardware engineering, said AI proved to be a valuable tool but could not replace decades of human experience.

"Artificial intelligence is a fantastic tool, but it's only as good as the information you use to train it," Poon told reporters, as quoted by the BBC.

He acknowledged that the company had underestimated the value of its most experienced engineers.

"Over prior years, we didn't pay as much attention as we should have to the experience of our most knowledgeable engineers that have been with us through many product cycles," he said.

Poon added that Ford's AI-driven quality checks had failed to deliver the expected results.

"Mistakenly, we thought that by just introducing artificial intelligence and ingesting the design requirements that we had, that would produce a high-quality product," he said.

The move marks a rare instance of a major manufacturer reversing course on AI in favour of greater human involvement in engineering and quality control.

The development comes as Ford reported a major milestone in product quality. The company said it ranked as the No. 1 mainstream brand in the J.D. Power 2026 U.S. Initial Quality Study (IQS), achieving the top position after a 16-year effort.

According to Ford, it climbed from 15th place in 2023 to first among mainstream brands in the annual survey of new-vehicle buyers.

As part of its renewed engineering strategy, Ford hired around 300 veteran engineers to strengthen vehicle design and quality from the earliest stages of development.

"Free from daily production schedules, these engineers now act as internal auditors, running mandatory weekly design reviews to hunt for and eliminate potential failure points before blueprints ever reach the factory floor," the company said in a statement.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.