September 21, 2026 09:56 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Arvind Kejriwal, family ‘missing’ from Delhi voter list, claims Aam Aadmi Party | ‘No UPI above ₹2,000?’ Ghaziabad traders put up ‘cash only’ hoardings | Trump signs Russia sanctions bill: India faces fresh 100% tariff threat over Moscow oil | Caught using ChatGPT for exam answers, IIT Bombay student dies by suicide; students protest | Congress' Nandigram candidate arrested after Mamata's support amid TMC symbol row; Bengal bypoll gets chaotic | Gurugram murder shocker: Groom-to-be leaves sisters at Delhi restaurant to meet ex-colleague, found dead days later | Delhi horror: Teen allegedly gangraped, stabbed to death and dumped in field; dogs eat parts of body | TMC name, symbol frozen: EC tells rival factions to pick new identities ahead of Bengal bypolls | Married just 17 days ago: Hyderabad engineer mysteriously found dead at US home | ‘We will promote cash’: New UPI charge triggers trader backlash, Opposition protests
EMI
Photo: Unsplash

He earns Rs 32,000, but bought an Rs. 85,000 watch on EMI—Sparks off online debate

| @indiablooms | Aug 22, 2026, at 04:34 pm

An Indian man has sparked an online debate after spending ₹85,000 on a luxury watch through EMI despite earning a monthly salary of ₹32,000.

The story was shared on X by a user named Aditya, who said the man was his friend.

“A friend of mine earns ₹32k/month,” Aditya wrote.

According to him, his friend recently bought an ₹85,000 luxury watch on EMI because his colleagues at the office were wearing premium brands.

However, the situation took an unexpected turn when the man later called Aditya asking for help with his house rent following an unforeseen expense.

“Yesterday he called asking if I could help him with his house rent after an unexpected expense,” Aditya wrote.

He said he helped his friend without thinking twice, but questioned the financial decision behind the expensive purchase.

“But I still don't understand one thing. Why do people buy status symbols before building financial stability?” Aditya asked.

“Nobody remembers what’s on your wrist. But you’ll definitely remember the stress of unpaid bills,” he added.

The post quickly gained attention online, triggering a debate over financial priorities, social pressure and the desire to maintain a certain lifestyle.

One user defended the decision, writing: “When you want to enter a certain circle, you need to make yourself look like you fit in. Just like this.”

Another shared a similar experience: “Yes. I have a friend who spent ₹2.5k on a stupid tattoo. And in next 6th day, phoned me up asking for ₹2k.”

A third user offered a more nuanced perspective, saying there was nothing inherently wrong with buying an expensive watch if someone could comfortably afford it.

“From a financial point of view, there is nothing wrong with buying a good watch if you can comfortably afford it,” the user wrote. “But if an ₹85k EMI purchase leaves you struggling with rent when an unexpected expense comes up, it’s a sign that savings and emergency funds should have come first.”

The user concluded: “Enjoy your money, but first make sure your basics are financially secure.”

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.