August 14, 2026 09:40 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Delhi on high alert: Bomb threat to High Court, airport and multiple locations ahead of I-Day | ‘Who are they to interfere?’: CJI Surya Kant slams Bar Council of India over NALSAR students’ enrolment row | 'Shows how low Congress has sunk': BJP slams Rahul Gandhi over Modi foreign policy jibe | From guns to glamour: Former women Maoists walk the ramp in Chhattisgarh | Netaji row: Suvendu Adhikari govt strips BJP MP Anant Maharaj of state honour | Sukhbir Badal attacked by Nihang Sikh with kirpan at Maharashtra gurdwara; assailant detained | ‘If you cannot do it, we will pass an order’: Supreme Court’s final warning to Centre on food labels | ‘Time to move on’: Bombay HC sends strong message in Vijay Mallya-bank dispute | Netaji row explodes in Bengal: Suvendu Adhikari orders police action over ‘derogatory’ posts | Kolkata's NRS Hospital nurse found dead in washroom during night shift
Image Credit: File image by Jimmy Vikas via Wikimedia Commons

Hindenburg Research attacks market regulator SEBI, reveals it made small gain with last year's Adani short-selling event

| @indiablooms | Jul 02, 2024, at 10:38 pm

New Delhi: Hindenburg Research criticised India’s market regulator for not addressing the alleged fraud in its report on the Adani Group from early last year, stating it gained just over $4 million from the short-selling event that led to a massive market downturn for the conglomerate, Bloomberg reported.

Securities and Exchange Board of India, or SEBI, “seems more interested in pursuing those who expose such practices” while its probe into billionaire Gautam Adani’s empire has hit a wall, the US short-seller said in a statement on its website Monday.

In June, SEBI issued a notice stating that Hindenburg’s scathing January 2023 report on the Adani Group contained certain misrepresentations and inaccurate statements intended to mislead readers.

The report generated nearly $4.1 million in gross revenue from Adani shorts through an unnamed investor relationship and around $31,000 from Hindenburg’s own short of Adani U.S. bonds, according to a July 1 statement from Hindenburg.

Last year, Hindenburg accused the ports-to-power conglomerate of extensive corporate misconduct, calling it "the largest con in corporate history." Despite the Adani Group's consistent denials, the following stock market crash wiped out over $150 billion in market value from its listed companies. However, the Adani Group has since recovered most of these losses.

Hindenburg claimed that SEBI’s notice “conspicuously failed to name the party that has an actual tie to India: Kotak Bank,” which oversaw the offshore fund structure used by Hindenburg’s investor partner to short Adani.

The regulator allegedly concealed the name "Kotak" using the acronym "KMIL," which stands for Kotak Mahindra Investments Ltd., the asset management company, it said.

“Sebi has neglected its responsibility, seemingly doing more to protect those perpetrating fraud than to protect the investors being victimized by it,” Hindenburg said in the statement.

After Hindenburg’s Adani report, the Supreme Court ordered SEBI to investigate accusations while forming an expert panel to look into regulatory gaps.

In January this year, the top court directed SEBI to conclude its investigation within three months and stated that no further probes were necessary.

Hindenburg’s latest attack comes as India’s newly rejuvenated opposition parties have been criticising Prime Minister Narendra Modi for crony capitalism, accusing him of favouring billionaires like Adani and Mukesh Ambani over ordinary citizens during a heated parliamentary standoff this week.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.