June 16, 2026 06:34 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Tragedy in the skies: Five IAF personnel killed in AN-32 crash in Assam | 'Ask probe officers whether I hid anything': Abhishek Banerjee hits back after pre-dawn police search | Police storm Abhishek Banerjee's house at 3 am tracking aide, Mamata arrives; seizure list says 'NIL' | Big boost for India's security: DRDO successfully tests advanced missile shield | Indian-origin man jailed for 34 years in UK over horrific kidnap, torture and rape case | Mamata's nightmare deepens! Saayoni Ghosh, Dev, Rachana Banerjee among 19 rebel MPs seeking TMC split | Trump claims US 'ended war with Iran', Tehran yet to confirm a deal | Heartbreak for Indian sports: Manu Bhaker's mentor Jaspal Rana passes away at 49 | Three Indian seafarers, missing after US strike on tanker near Oman, confirmed dead | 'Choose your side': TMC MP Kalyan Banerjee's ultimatum to Mamata in open revolt against Abhishek
Taxation

Income of company with no presence in India is not taxable: ITAT

| @indiablooms | Nov 20, 2021, at 01:43 am

New Delhi/IBNS: A tax tribunal has ruled that domestic taxes cannot be levied on a company that doesn't have any presence in India, media reports said.

The ruling was given by the Delhi Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in the case of ESPN, the sports channel, versus the tax authorities, ET reported.

The tribunal held that ESPN did not have a permanent establishment (PE) in India or a business connection in India, hence domestic taxes cannot be levied on the company.

The report said ESPN was selling advertisement slots and programme sponsorship in India through an Indian company-ESPN Software India.

The intermediary company would acquire advertisement time from the Mauritius entity or would further sell that to Indian advertising agencies, said the ET report.

The tax department contended that the income generated in this way is taxable as the payment was made by the Indian companies for the advertisements.

But the tribunal ruled ESPN was covered under India's tax treaty-double tax avoidance agreement (DTAA)-with Mauritius, and that India doesn't have a right to tax the company, stated the ET report.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.
Related Videos
RBI announces repo rate cut Jun 06, 2025, at 10:51 am
FM Nirmala Sitharaman presents Budget 2025 Feb 01, 2025, at 03:45 pm
Nirmala Sitharaman on Budget 2024 Jul 23, 2024, at 09:30 pm