December 25, 2025 10:00 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Tarique Rahman returns to Bangladesh after 17 years | Shocking killing inside AMU campus: teacher shot dead during evening walk | Horror on Karnataka highway: sleeper bus bursts into flames after truck crash, 9 killed | PM Modi attends Christmas service at Delhi church, sends message of love and compassion | Delhi erupts over lynching of Hindu man in Bangladesh; protest outside High Commission | Targeted killing sparks global outrage: American lawmakers condemn mob lynching of Hindu man in Bangladesh | Assam on a ‘powder keg’: Himanta Biswa Sarma flags demographic shift, Chicken’s Neck fears | Bangladesh on edge: Student leader shot as pre-poll violence deepens after Hadi killing | Historic deal sealed: India, New Zealand sign landmark Free Trade Agreement in record time | Supreme court snubs urgent plea to stop PMO’s chadar offering at Ajmer Sharif
UNI

Ayodhya dispute: Muslim side continue pleadings in Supreme Court

| @indiablooms | Oct 04, 2019, at 07:25 pm

New Delhi, Oct 4 (UNI) The Muslim side on Friday submitted to a five-judge Constitution bench of the Supreme Court that attempts were made by Hindus to force the community to leave the disputed site at Ayodhya but were foiled.

'We knew travellers stories. We have a chabutra. There are different views on it," senior counsel Dr Rajeev Dhavan told the Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi-led bench, hearing a batch of appeals against the September 2010 Allahabad High Court trifurcation of the disputed 2.77 acres.

'Our pleadings are very simple. We don't know what happened before 1855 except accounts by travellers,' Dr Dhavan submitted.  

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.