September 16, 2026 09:09 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Gurugram biker hit by car: Two including main accused arrested after viral road rage video, attempt to murder case filed | Gurugram horror caught on camera: ‘I felt unsafe’—car chases, rams woman biker and flees | BRICS veg menu row: ‘Why shouldn’t we showcase it?’—Harsh Goenka hits back after Rahul Gandhi’s ‘80%’ remark | India-UAE Comprehensive Strategic Partnership in focus: Modi meets Abu Dhabi Crown Prince on BRICS sidelines | Xi Jinping lands in India for BRICS; big Modi meeting set for New Delhi | ‘Hospitality on another level’: South African official stunned by India’s BRICS hosting | Suvendu Adhikari eats fish bhog at Kalighat Temple amid Bageshwar Baba row | Bangladeshi Hindu monk Chinmoy Krishna Das breaks down emotionally as he gets 5-hour parole to attend mother’s funeral | Sheikh Hasina’s daughter Saima Wazed quits WHO post amid fraud allegations | After days of silence, China confirms Xi Jinping’s India visit for BRICS Summit

Ayodhya verdict: Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind files review petition

| @indiablooms | Dec 02, 2019, at 05:22 pm

New Delhi/UNI/IBNS: Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind, through Maulana Syed Ashhad Rashidi, the legal heir of the original plaintiff in the Ramjanmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land (Title) dispute, on Monday filed a review petition against the Supreme Court's judgement on the Ayodhya case.

A five-judge constitution bench had given the judgement.

Maulana Syed Ashhad Rashidi, legal heir of original Ayodhya land dispute litigant M Siddiq, filed the 217-page petition in the apex court seeking review of its November 9 judgment giving disputed land to Ram Lalla.

The main contention in the review petition of JUH is the title granted by 'disregarding' documentary evidence.

It has not been listed yet before the Supreme Court but may come up for hearing after Dec 9 and within a period of 15 days.

A five-judge constitution bench of the apex court had decreed that the disputed land be given to the Hindu side and a five-acre area in a different place to the Muslim side. 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.