July 07, 2026 04:57 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Amid outrage over Baruipur, another minor girl allegedly raped in West Bengal | Kerala rain fury: 2 dead, 10 feared trapped as massive Wayanad landslide triggers rescue race | Rick Scott revives Bin Laden issue, questions Pakistan's credibility as Iran mediator | Mbappé vs Paraguayan Senator: Ugly World Cup spat spirals into international controversy | Ronaldo's World Cup dream shattered! Spain knock Portugal out, set up Belgium blockbuster | China tests ballistic missile from nuclear submarine in Pacific: Australia, New Zealand respond | Baruipur horror: Main accused in alleged rape and murder of minor girl arrested; senior cops dissatisfied with handling of the case | Defence stocks jump after Rs 52,000 crore DAC approval sparks buying frenzy | 'Harry Kane is a great player': Donald Trump after England knocked Mexico out of the World Cup | 'Referee gave a lot against us': Harry Kane reacts after England's dramatic win over Mexico
Doklam
Image Credit: wikipedia.org

'Beijing has equal say in resolving dispute': Bhutan takes u-turn on Doklam issue

| @indiablooms | Mar 29, 2023, at 05:14 am

In an apparent change of stand on the Doklam issue, Bhutan's Prime Minister Lotay Tshering has said Beijing’s involvement carries equal weight in finding a solution to the dispute over the high-altitude plateau.

Tshering has stressed there are “three of us”—India, Bhutan and China—who need to sit down and discuss resolving the problem.

''It is not up to Bhutan alone to solve the problem,'' said Prime Minister Lotay Tshering in an interview with the Belgian daily La Libre, reported NDTV. ''There are three of us. There is no big or small country, there are three equal countries, each counting for a third.''

Tshering’s assertion that China, too, has a stake in resolving the dispute is in contrast to India’s stance that Beijing has been illegally occupying the area.

The Bhutanese prime minister’s statement is a matter of deep concern for New Delhi because of Doklam’s proximity to the crucial Siliguri corridor, which acts as a narrow buffer separating India's Northeastern states from the rest of the country.

In 2019, Tshering told The Hindu that ''no side'' should do anything near the existing trijunction point between the three countries ''unilaterally"

Now, Bhutan's Prime Minister says, ''We are ready. As soon as the other two parties are ready too, we can discuss.''

The shift indicates that Thimphu is open to discussing the status of the tri-junction in Doklam between India, China and Bhutan, which lies at the centre of the dispute.

The trijunction point, which is shown on global maps for many years, is located at Batang La. China's Chumbi Valley is situated north of Batang La, Bhutan is situated to the south and east, and India's Sikkim state is located to the west.

However, China wants to shift the trijunction 7 km south of Batang La to a point called Mt Gipmochi.

In that case, the entire Doklam plateau would come under China's legal jurisdiction, which would be unacceptable to New Delhi.

In 2017, a tense confrontation between Indian and Chinese soldiers lasted over two months. The Indian soldiers had entered the Doklam plateau to halt China's unlawful construction of a road leading to Mount Gipmochi and the Jhampheri ridge.

The Indian Army's stance is unequivocal - the Chinese Army cannot be permitted to occupy Jhampheri, as it would provide them unobstructed access to the Siliguri corridor.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.