August 13, 2026 11:22 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Netaji row: Suvendu Adhikari govt strips BJP MP Anant Maharaj of state honour | Sukhbir Badal attacked by Nihang Sikh with kirpan at Maharashtra gurdwara; assailant detained | ‘If you cannot do it, we will pass an order’: Supreme Court’s final warning to Centre on food labels | ‘Time to move on’: Bombay HC sends strong message in Vijay Mallya-bank dispute | Netaji row explodes in Bengal: Suvendu Adhikari orders police action over ‘derogatory’ posts | Kolkata's NRS Hospital nurse found dead in washroom during night shift | RG Kar rape-murder case takes fresh turn as ex-TMC MLA Nirmal Ghosh arrested over cremation probe | ‘Govt has nothing to hide’: Amit Shah says ‘ready for debate’ on NEET crackdown; Rahul Gandhi hits back, ‘not interested in lecture’ | Tata Sons leadership shock: N Chandrasekaran won’t seek reappointment as chairman after February 2027 | ISI-linked Pakistani national arrested in Bengal over 'espionage' targeting Army, BSF, Railways
SIR
Supreme Court raises concerns over Bengal voter deletion. Photo: SC website/ChatGPT

'ECI deviated from Bihar procedure': Supreme Court raises concerns over voter deletion in Bengal SIR

| @indiablooms | Apr 13, 2026, at 02:24 pm

New Delhi/IBNS: The massive voter revision drive in West Bengal has come under sharper scrutiny, with the Supreme Court on Monday expressing concerns over the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise in the poll-bound state, Live Law reported.

What did the court say?

Justice Joymalya Bagchi flagged concerns over the SIR process, stressing the need for a robust appellate tribunal to hear appeals against deletions from around 60 lakh adjudicated cases.

He noted that the Election Commission of India deviated from procedures followed in other states by introducing a category of “logical discrepancy” in West Bengal.

The judge also pointed out inconsistencies with the Bihar SIR, where voters listed in the 2002 electoral roll were not required to submit documents.

“Please see your written submissions in the Bihar case. You had said the 2002 electorate need not give documents,” Justice Bagchi was quoted as saying.

‘100% accuracy not possible’

Justice Bagchi observed that judicial officers verifying lakhs of cases under tight deadlines cannot be expected to deliver 100 percent accuracy.

He noted that even 70 percent accuracy would be “excellent” for someone handling nearly 1,000 cases a day under pressure.

The court also flagged concerns over potential electoral impact if significant numbers of voters are unable to cast their votes due to deletions.

Scale of deletions

Nearly 91 lakh voters have been dropped from the rolls during the controversial SIR exercise.

  • Over 27 lakh names deleted from 60 lakh adjudicated cases
  • In addition to 63 lakh already removed earlier

The Muslim-majority district of Murshidabad recorded the highest deletions, with around 4.5 lakh names struck off from 11 lakh adjudicated cases.

What does it mean for voters?

The Supreme Court had earlier directed the formation of appellate tribunals to hear appeals against deletions.

However, these are unlikely to conclude hearings before polling begins.

  • Phase 1: April 23
  • Phase 2: April 29

The court also clarified that interim inclusion of voters who failed verification cannot be permitted.

Why it matters

West Bengal is among five poll-bound states where the SIR exercise is underway—the first large-scale revision since 2002.

With elections just days away, the deletion of nearly 91 lakh voters could significantly impact political strategies and electoral outcomes across the state.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.