September 25, 2026 06:07 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
‘How does anti-incumbency disappear?’: Rahul Gandhi targets Modi, Shah in fresh ‘vote chori’ attack, demands Gyanesh Kumar’s resignation | Opposition readies fresh impeachment push against Gyanesh Kumar over SIR report | ‘Resign in 48 hours or face nationwide agitation’: CJP’s ultimatum to Gyanesh Kumar over SIR row | IIT Bombay student’s parents begin hunger strike, demand arrest of officials | Nandigram bypoll shock: Calcutta HC shields Congress candidate Milan Pradhan in 2007 case, but will he walk free? | ‘I don’t care if you die’: Driver’s chilling response before Noida bus went up in flames | Contempt case against CEC Gyanesh Kumar? Supreme Court advocate seeks AG's consent | Days after Jamui outrage, another girl sexually harassed in Bihar; 4 arrested | 9 burnt to death as sleeper bus carrying 35 catches fire on Noida highway | ‘Gyanesh, it’s done bro!’: CJP turns up heat on CEC after explosive SIR report

Gujarat assembly passes draconian anti-terror and crime bill

| | Mar 31, 2015, at 07:50 pm
Ahmedabad, Mar 31 (IBNS) Amid a walkout by the Opposition the Gujarat Assembly on Tuesday passed a controversial anti-terror bill that was in the past rejected by two former Indian presidents.

The Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organised Crime Bill was passed in the state Assembly by the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) on Tuesday.

The bill is similar to the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA).

In the past former President AJP Abdul Kalam and Pratibha Patil had refused to sign off the proposal and had suggested some amendments.

The bill was thus passed for the fourth time in past 12 years.

Gujarat junior Home Minister Rajni Patel was quoted saying that the bill is necessary to control not only terrorism but also organized crime.

The bill reportedly gives too much power to the police and confessions to cops, phone call interceptions and recordings are admissible evidence under this Bill if it was made into a law, said its opponents.

Human rights activists slammed the bill saying it will lead to custodial torture. 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.