September 13, 2026 10:52 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
India-UAE Comprehensive Strategic Partnership in focus: Modi meets Abu Dhabi Crown Prince on BRICS sidelines | Xi Jinping lands in India for BRICS; big Modi meeting set for New Delhi | ‘Hospitality on another level’: South African official stunned by India’s BRICS hosting | Suvendu Adhikari eats fish bhog at Kalighat Temple amid Bageshwar Baba row | Bangladeshi Hindu monk Chinmoy Krishna Das breaks down emotionally as he gets 5-hour parole to attend mother’s funeral | Sheikh Hasina’s daughter Saima Wazed quits WHO post amid fraud allegations | After days of silence, China confirms Xi Jinping’s India visit for BRICS Summit | Big setback for Abhishek Banerjee as CID arrests aide Sumit Roy | Firebrand Tukaram Mundhe’s Food Safety Blitz Hits ISKCON Juhu, 3 Licences Suspended | Vande Mataram row erupts in INDIA bloc: Congress objects, ally NC hits back, BJP pounces

Have not supported the communication blockade in valley: PCI chairman

| @indiablooms | Aug 28, 2019, at 09:05 pm

New Delhi, Aug 28 (UNI): Press Council of India on Wednesday refuted the comments made by noted journalist N Ram that the council was supporting the communication curbs in Jammu and Kashmir.

In a letter to N Ram, council chairman Justice Chandramauli Kumar Prasad, referring to a news report published in an English daily on Wednesday that had a heading that 'PCI backing J and K curbs undemocratic: N Ram’, said that in his intervention application in the Supreme court, he had not supported the communication blockade.

"From a plain reading of the intervention application filed by the council in the Supreme court, it is evident that I have not supported the communication blockade," he said.

I will advise you to read the intervention application which is available on the website and point out a single sentence or a single word where I have “supported the communication blockade in the valley. I challenge, you will not find anything like that,’’ Justice Prasad said in his letter.

He said that the very premise of the news report was falsehood.

"According to the news report, you have allegedly stated that it was shocking that the PCI-that is supposed to protect the freedom of the press, independence of the press, freedom of journalists- had taken a position supporting the communication blockade in the valley."

"The very premise on which you have build this superstructure, mildly speaking, is a blatant lie. I am sure you have not read the ‘intervention application, filed by the council before the Supreme Court but greatly swayed by distorted media reports,’’ Justice Prasad said.

 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.