August 09, 2026 08:51 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
‘A morning I will cherish’: Raghav Chadha meets PM Modi, shares photos from ‘enriching’ meeting | Delhi Mercedes crash kills 70-year-old woman: Cop’s son behind wheel, beer bottle found | Indian-origin woman accused of ‘visa fraud’ on X: US Attorney steps in with major clarification | US Senate passes Russia sanctions bill: India can face Trump’s 100% tariff threat | Expired meat, rotten vegetables found at Bengaluru's luxury hotels, legal action begins | 'I'm ready to be humiliated': Vijay, Udhayanidhi Stalin clash in Tamil Nadu Assembly over Cauvery dispute | 'They don't need Mohan Bhagwat's certificate': Priyanka Gandhi Vadra's sharp reply to RSS chief's Gen Z remark | 'Students, Gen Z, ask me anything': Rahul Gandhi launches Instagram Q&A, responds to Jharkhand protest | PM Modi goes Gen Z, urges Indians to share 'Get Ready With Me' videos on National Handloom Day | Former Tehelka editor Tarun Tejpal sentenced to 10-year jail term in 2013 rape case as Bombay HC overturns acquittal

India awaits Supreme Court verdict on gay sex as judges set to rule on Section 377 today

| @indiablooms | Sep 06, 2018, at 10:23 am

New Delhi, Sept 6 (IBNS): The Supreme Court is likely to pronounce its verdict today on whether homosexuality will continue to remain a crime in India with the top court set to rule on the validity of Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code.

A five-judge bench headed by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra will deliver its verdict on whether Section 377 that holds gay sex as an offence in India will remain or not. In 2013, the top court had upheld gay-sex as an offence though this section was read down by the Delhi High Court in July 2009 in response to a Naz Foundation petition in the Delhi high court against Section 377.

That judgement was overturned by the Supreme Court on 11 December 2013  holding that amending or repealing section 377 should be a matter left to Parliament, not the judiciary.

Besides Chief Justice Dipak Misra the bench comprises judges R.F. Nariman, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y.Chandrachud, and Indu Malhotra.

In Aug 2017, the Supreme Court had held Right to Privacy as a fundamental right. It also ruled that sexual orientation is an "essential component of identity". In July this year, the apex court began hearing petitions challenging Section 377 wth indications that it might be repealed.

Chapter XVI, Section 377 of the IPC dates back to 1860 introduced during the British rule of India, and it criminalises sexual activities "against the order of nature", arguably including homosexual acts.

According to it, Unnatural offences means: "Whoever voluntarily has carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment of either description for term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine."

The Delhi High Court verdict of July 2009 was not challenged by the Government of India. Since then it was like a law in India. But the SC verdict of 2013 changed all that and gay sex again became illegal in India.

 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.