February 10, 2026 09:15 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Bangladesh poll manifestos mirror India’s welfare schemes as BNP, Jamaat bet big on women, freebies | Drama ends: Pakistan makes U-turn on India boycott, to play T20 World Cup clash as per schedule | ‘Won’t allow any impediment in SIR’: Supreme Court pulls up Mamata govt over delay in sharing officers’ details | India-US trade deal: ‘Negotiations always two-way’, says Amul MD amid farmers’ concerns | Khamenei breaks 37-year-old ritual for first time amid escalating Iran-US tensions | India must push for energy independence amid global uncertainty: Vedanta chairman Anil Agarwal | Kanpur horror: Lamborghini driven by businessman’s son rams vehicles, injures six | ‘Namaste Trump beat Howdy Modi’: Congress slams PM Over India-US trade deal | Historic India-US trade pact: Tariffs cut, $500B market opportunity unlocked! | Big call from RBI: Repo rate stays at 5.25%, neutral stance continues
SIR
Mamata Banerjee with other advocates in the Supreme Court. Photo: AITC/X

New Delhi/IBNS: West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee on Wednesday took her political battle with the Election Commission of India (ECI) to the Supreme Court, launching a sharp attack on the poll body over the controversial Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls.

In an unusual moment in the top court, Banerjee bypassed her counsel and addressed the bench directly for nearly 10–15 minutes, raising concerns over what she described as discrimination against poll-bound West Bengal.

The bench, led by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, assured her that the court would attempt to resolve the differences and work towards a solution.

“Sir, the problem is… in the end, we are not getting justice anywhere. I have written six times to the ECI but still not getting any reply. Justice is crying behind closed doors,” the Chief Minister said, folding her hands before the bench.

As her submission progressed, Banerjee escalated her criticism of the Election Commission, alleging that the poll body was following a separate and unfair set of rules for West Bengal, one of the 12 states where the voter revision exercise is currently underway.

Repeating allegations she has made outside the courtroom, Banerjee claimed that voters’ names were deleted due to changes in surnames — a common occurrence among married women.

She also alleged that micro-observers appointed for the exercise were drawn from Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-ruled states.

Responding to the allegations, the ECI submitted that non-cooperation by the West Bengal government had compelled it to appoint micro-observers from other states.

Banerjee further drew the court’s attention to six letters she claimed to have written to the Election Commission, alleging that none of them received a response.

Taking note of her submissions, the CJI Surya Kant-led bench issued notice to the Election Commission on Banerjee’s plea. The matter is scheduled to be heard next on Monday.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.