April 07, 2025 11:35 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
CJI Sanjiv Khanna to decide on listing pleas challenging Waqf (Amendment) Act | Mamata Banerjee backs Bengal teachers who lost jobs, says she has plans to accommodate them | Drunk filmmaker Siddhant Das rams car into Kolkata market, one killed, several injured | Kunal Kamra moves Bombay High Court, seeks quashing of FIR over Eknath Shinde parody | Amit Shah briefs BJP MLAs in his three-day Jammu and Kashmir visit | Bengal BJP leaders participate in Ram Navami rallies across state | PM Modi to inaugurate new Pamban Rail Bridge, connecting Rameswaram to Indian mainland, today | Huge protests erupt in Kolkata, Chennai after parliament passes Waqf Amendment Bill | India’s growth outlook dims after US tariffs; deeper rate cuts likely, say analysts: Report | K Annamalai says he is not in a race to become Tamil Nadu BJP's next president
Article 370
Image Credit: Twitter/Mehbooba Mufti

Mehbooba Mufti expresses apprehension over SC's decision to hold daily hearings on Article 370 abrogation

| @indiablooms | Jul 12, 2023, at 02:00 am

Srinagar/IBNS/UNI: People’s Democratic Party (PDP) chief Mehbooba Mufti Tuesday expressed her apprehension over the Supreme Court’s decision to hold daily hearings of pleas challenging the abrogation of Article 370 “after remaining silent for four years.”

Earlier in the day, the Supreme Court decided to hear on a day-to-day basis from August 2 a batch of petitions challenging the Centre's August 5, 2019, decision to scrap special status under Article 370 of Jammu & Kashmir.

Mufti took to Twitter to express her apprehension. “…SCs decision to not rely on GOIs affidavit vindicates that it doesnt have a logical explanation to justify illegal abrogation of Article 370. Having said that there are legitimate apprehensions about why SC has taken up the Article 370 with such alacrity after their visit to Kashmir. After remaining silent for four years the decision to hear the case on a daily basis does evoke misgivings,” she wrote.

“Hope the constitution of this country by which judiciary swears is not sacrificed at the altar of power to satisfy the collective conscience of people who know little about the matter,” she added.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.
Close menu