July 16, 2026 05:06 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'Why introduce a new language in Class 9?' Supreme Court questions Centre's policy | 'Save Sonam Wangchuk's life': Delhi High Court to Centre as hunger strike enters Day 19 | Atul Kulkarni observes one-day fast in support of Sonam Wangchuk, urges Centre to initiate dialogue | Argentina stun England with late rally to storm into FIFA World Cup 2026 final | 'He could die in two days': Delhi HC plea seeks force-feeding of Sonam Wangchuk as fast enters Day 18 | 'Tonight's defeat is hard to take': Emmanuel Macron reacts after France crash out of World Cup, congratulates Spain | Spain cruise past France to storm into FIFA World Cup 2026 final with clinical 2-0 victory | Taslima Nasrin announces Kolkata return after 20 years to attend literary event at Rabindra Sadan | 'We must not watch one of our greatest minds be sacrificed': Zeenat Aman backs Sonam Wangchuk, urges govt to open dialogue | 'I don't want Phunsukh Wangdu to die': '3 Idiots' star Omi Vaidya's emotional appeal for Sonam Wangchuk
SC
Image: UNI

New farm laws: Supreme Court asks Centre to file reply

| @indiablooms | Oct 12, 2020, at 10:06 pm

New Delhi/UNI: The Supreme Court on Monday sought a reply from the Centre on petitions challenging the new farm-related laws.

The bench, headed by Chief Justice of India S A Bobde, took three petitions--one filed by advocate M L Sharma, other by Chhattisgarh Kisan Congress and the third by DMK MP Tiruchi Seva.

During the hearing, Advocate K Parameshar, appearing for the Congress, told the court that the new laws will do away with mandi system.

To this, the CJI asked the petitioner to knock the doors of respective High Courts, for which the advoted replied that High Courts may pass conflicting judgments leading to more chaos.

The CJI then asked the Attorney General to file a reply on the petitions. The Attorney General, agreeing with the court, said the reply will be filed by the Centre within six weeks.

As per the news laws, the farmers will now be able to sell their produce outside mandis or private players can buy directly from farmers. The laws provide a legal framework for contract farming. Lastly, stock limits and price control over food items like cereals, pulses, onions, edible oilseeds and oils under Essential Commodities Act have been removed.

The petitions claim that the new laws will do away with the Agriculture Produce Marketing Committee (APMC) that ensured fair prices for farmers' produce and small and marginal farmers will be left at the mercy of corporate players.

It also claims that the laws are unconstitutional as "only States" have power to make or amend laws related to agriculture and its trade as it is the State Subject under Seventh Schedule of the Constitution. Parliament acted against federalism by encroaching upon the powers of the State, the petition filed by the DMK MP said.

The law violates Article 14 (equality before the law), 21 (Protection of life and personal liberty), 23 (Prohibition of forced labour), the petition filed by Kisan Congress Chhattishgrah said. It also said as many farmers belong to Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe communities, the new laws will take away the protection under fifth and sixth schedule.

The laws lead to widespread protests by farmers, their unions and organisations, activists and opposition at several states, and more concentrated in Punjab and Haryana. 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.