July 16, 2026 10:29 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'Why introduce a new language in Class 9?' Supreme Court questions Centre's policy | 'Save Sonam Wangchuk's life': Delhi High Court to Centre as hunger strike enters Day 19 | Atul Kulkarni observes one-day fast in support of Sonam Wangchuk, urges Centre to initiate dialogue | Argentina stun England with late rally to storm into FIFA World Cup 2026 final | 'He could die in two days': Delhi HC plea seeks force-feeding of Sonam Wangchuk as fast enters Day 18 | 'Tonight's defeat is hard to take': Emmanuel Macron reacts after France crash out of World Cup, congratulates Spain | Spain cruise past France to storm into FIFA World Cup 2026 final with clinical 2-0 victory | Taslima Nasrin announces Kolkata return after 20 years to attend literary event at Rabindra Sadan | 'We must not watch one of our greatest minds be sacrificed': Zeenat Aman backs Sonam Wangchuk, urges govt to open dialogue | 'I don't want Phunsukh Wangdu to die': '3 Idiots' star Omi Vaidya's emotional appeal for Sonam Wangchuk
Prashant Bhushan

New SC bench to hear 2009 contempt case against Prashant Bhushan on Sept 10

| @indiablooms | Aug 26, 2020, at 01:33 am

New Delhi/UNI: A new bench of the Supreme Court will hear the 2009 contempt case, in which activist-lawyer Prashant Bhushan allegedly made remarks calling half of 16 former Chief Justices 'corrupt', on Sept 10.

Apex Court bench, headed by Justice Arun Mishra on Tuesday said that since he is retiring on Sept 2, there is a paucity of time to address the questions which would require a lengthy hearing.

The bench agreed to refer to an appropriate bench the question of conflict between the right to free speech and suo moto contempt powers of the court in the 2009 contempt case against Bhushan, which was initiated for calling past Chief Justices as 'corrupt.'

Justice Mishra said, since Bhushan's counsel, Rajeev Dhavan has raised many questions, there is a paucity of time, otherwise we would have heard the senior counsel with respect to the questions which have been proposed.

"However, since the matter is pending for the last 10 years, as prayed for, we fix the date for Sept 10 before an appropriate Bench as may deem fit by the Chief Justice," the top court asserted.

 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.