March 13, 2026 02:34 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
America’s flip-flop on Russian oil: How Washington sends conflicting signals to India | Big diplomatic win! Iran allows Indian oil tankers through the Strait of Hormuz | ‘It was over in the first hour’: Trump declares victory in Iran war, says ‘nothing left to target’ | Indian-origin shopkeepers face targeted attacks in Wembley; Somali men suspected | Iran pulls out of 2026 FIFA World Cup amid war with US-Israel | Supreme Court allows first-ever passive euthanasia for 32-year-old man in coma for 13 years | As Iran-US war disrupts global gas supply, India issues guidelines to manage shortages | LPG crisis hits metros: Commercial cylinder shortage triggers panic as govt prioritises domestic supply | Iran war disrupts LPG supplies, restaurants in major Indian cities edge towards shutdown | ‘How dare you question judicial officers?’: SC raps Bengal SIR pleas, orders appellate tribunals for voter list appeals

Nirbhaya's friend says India's daughter far from truth

| | Mar 10, 2015, at 10:45 pm
New Delhi, Mar 10(IBNS) As the ban on a documentary on the 2012 Delhi gang-rape and murder has kicked up a heated nationwide debate, the sole witness to the incident, says the film is "far from the truth."

Avinandra Pandey, who was accompanying Nribhaya on the fateful night and was severely beaten up by the attackers on board a private bus, has told CNN-IBN that Leslee Udwin's "India's daughter" is "unbalanced" and does not portray what really happened.

"The documentary is unbalanced as the victim's viewpoint is missing. The facts are hidden and the content is fake. Only Jyoti and I know what happened on that night and the documentary is far from truth," he says.

Pandey saus he has never heard the name of tutor Satendra, who features in the documentary. "Moreover, how does he know which movie I wanted to watch on that night," he asks.

The documentary also features the interview of one of the rapists, Mukesh Singh, who is on death row and his statement that the girls themselves are more responsible than boys for rapes  has created a great controversy prompting the government to put a ban on the film.

Questions were also raised on how a murder convict can be interviewed inside the prison.

"A controversy was created unnecessarily and was sensationalised. The documentary made fun of emotions and questioned the law and order situation in our country," Pandey says.

Defending the government's action, he says, "The documentary has impaired country's image and questioned law and order situation. It  showed that any individual can enter the Central Jail of our country and can interview a criminal."

Replying a question  whether he was approached to be part of the documentary, Pandey says, "I was approached by many people and it started one and a half years ago, in 2013. I did not want to be part of it as I was not convinced by its motive. Also, I was not mentally prepared and had health issues as well.".

He also appeals that there should be a censor board for documentaries as well.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.