July 23, 2026 11:53 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'We won't leave Jantar Mantar until Dharmendra Pradhan resigns': CJP draws red line | 'Don't waste our time': Supreme Court snubs plea on NEET protest crackdown | Trump's 200% tariff bomb on generic drugs: Here's how India could be hit | Rahul Gandhi, Priyanka Gandhi Vadra lead Congress march to PM Modi's residence over student protest crackdown | 'We can't ignore his concerns': Delhi HC gives Sonam Wangchuk big relief, clears shift to private hospital | 'Students are being tortured': Mamata Banerjee offers to join CJP protest in Delhi | Sikkim tunnel horror: 8 dead, several feared trapped after NHPC project collapse | As NEET protests intensify, PM Modi defends govt action, calls for 'foolproof' education system | After NEET storm, Modi govt faces fresh challenge as farmers march to Delhi over India-US trade deal | Jantar Mantar reclaimed! CJP defies overnight police eviction, returns to protest site

Nirbhaya's friend says India's daughter far from truth

| | Mar 10, 2015, at 10:45 pm
New Delhi, Mar 10(IBNS) As the ban on a documentary on the 2012 Delhi gang-rape and murder has kicked up a heated nationwide debate, the sole witness to the incident, says the film is "far from the truth."

Avinandra Pandey, who was accompanying Nribhaya on the fateful night and was severely beaten up by the attackers on board a private bus, has told CNN-IBN that Leslee Udwin's "India's daughter" is "unbalanced" and does not portray what really happened.

"The documentary is unbalanced as the victim's viewpoint is missing. The facts are hidden and the content is fake. Only Jyoti and I know what happened on that night and the documentary is far from truth," he says.

Pandey saus he has never heard the name of tutor Satendra, who features in the documentary. "Moreover, how does he know which movie I wanted to watch on that night," he asks.

The documentary also features the interview of one of the rapists, Mukesh Singh, who is on death row and his statement that the girls themselves are more responsible than boys for rapes  has created a great controversy prompting the government to put a ban on the film.

Questions were also raised on how a murder convict can be interviewed inside the prison.

"A controversy was created unnecessarily and was sensationalised. The documentary made fun of emotions and questioned the law and order situation in our country," Pandey says.

Defending the government's action, he says, "The documentary has impaired country's image and questioned law and order situation. It  showed that any individual can enter the Central Jail of our country and can interview a criminal."

Replying a question  whether he was approached to be part of the documentary, Pandey says, "I was approached by many people and it started one and a half years ago, in 2013. I did not want to be part of it as I was not convinced by its motive. Also, I was not mentally prepared and had health issues as well.".

He also appeals that there should be a censor board for documentaries as well.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.