March 12, 2026 11:59 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
America’s flip-flop on Russian oil: How Washington sends conflicting signals to India | Big diplomatic win! Iran allows Indian oil tankers through the Strait of Hormuz | ‘It was over in the first hour’: Trump declares victory in Iran war, says ‘nothing left to target’ | Indian-origin shopkeepers face targeted attacks in Wembley; Somali men suspected | Iran pulls out of 2026 FIFA World Cup amid war with US-Israel | Supreme Court allows first-ever passive euthanasia for 32-year-old man in coma for 13 years | As Iran-US war disrupts global gas supply, India issues guidelines to manage shortages | LPG crisis hits metros: Commercial cylinder shortage triggers panic as govt prioritises domestic supply | Iran war disrupts LPG supplies, restaurants in major Indian cities edge towards shutdown | ‘How dare you question judicial officers?’: SC raps Bengal SIR pleas, orders appellate tribunals for voter list appeals

No internal democracy in AAP: Ilmi stokes smouldering fire

| | Mar 02, 2015, at 10:37 pm
New Delhi, Mar 2(IBNS) As the Aam Aadmi Party's resounding electoral victory in Delhi slowly gives way to its internal conflict with rift widening between Arvind Kejriwal and Yogendra Yadav-Prashant Bhushan camps, party's former member Shazia Ilmi on Monday alleged that the organisation was suffering from lack of internal democracy and transparency.

 "There is absence of internal democracy in AAP," Ilmi, who is now a Bharatiya Janata Party leader, said.

In what appeared to be a BJP move drive the wedge deeper within the AAP, Ilmi supported Yadav and Bhushan, whose prominence in the party may be cutrailed in the AAP national executive meet on March 4, saying both the leaders were right in their stand.

"Bhushan and Yadav are very senior, what they are saying is right. There is no transparency in the party, there is nepotism," she said.

Her remarks came after reports of a tussle among the top AAP leaders came to the fore.

Pro-Kejriwal leaders alleged that Yogendra Yadav, Prashant Bhushan and Shanti Bhushan were conspiring against Arvind Kejriwal.

AAP's Delhi secretary Dilip Pandey alleged that Yogendra Yadav, Prashant Bhushan and Shanti Bhushan  acted "in concert towards a singular aim of weakening the party and then replacing Kejriwal with Yadav as party head."

He in a letter targeting the anti-Kejriwal group said: "Worst part was when, a few weeks before elections, Mr Prashant Bhushan said in presence of a senior Party Leader and a Mission Vistar member that he would rather want the party to loose the elections so that Kejriwal could be removed and a major overhaul of the party could be carried out. Bhushan refused to campaign for the party and also planted several anti-party stories at a time when the party was going through its most severe crisis."

He said in another part of the letter addressed to Pankaj Gupta, National Secretary, Member (Disciplinary Committee): "Before General Elections, 2014, Mr Vijay Raman, who was personal assistant of Mr Yogendra Yadav and was handling his election campaign, phoned Mr Satya, an important party member and told him that Mr. Yadav wanted to interview him for a role in his core team. When Mr Satya went to meet Raman, the latter told him that Mr Arvind Kejriwal didn't have the required political acumen and it was imperative for Mr Yogendra Yadav to take over as National Convenor of AAP after removing Kejriwal from the post. Mr Satya was shocked to hear this. He informed senior members of the party of how Mr Yadav's office was conspiring against Kejriwal and hatching conspiracies to take over as the party convenor."

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.