September 03, 2026 02:07 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Bombay HC orders CBI probe into Sushant Singh Rajput's ex-manager Disha Salian's death case | Vijay for PM in 2029? TVK says Rahul Gandhi will ‘hold his hand’ to make him Prime Minister | CJP calls off Sept 5 Delhi march after Supreme Court quashes FIRs against protesters | ‘Dismantle entire terror ecosystem’: Modi’s strong message at SCO Summit in Shehbaz’s presence | Modi’s big appeal after 7.8% GDP growth: ‘Don’t travel abroad, avoid destination weddings’ | Modi-Pezeshkian talks: Iran seeks India’s 'extensive contacts' to end West Asia war | Indus Waters Treaty row: India rejects Hague court order, says ‘no jurisdiction’ over its sovereign decisions | India beats the odds with 7.8% GDP growth; PM Modi has a message for critics | PM Modi meets Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian during SCO summit in Kyrgyzstan | ‘Islam superior to all religions’: Karnataka minister’s remark sparks BJP-Congress war; resignation demand grows
Pakistan
Image cr: Qasim Suri/FB

Pakistan: SC ruling on deputy speaker’s action

| @indiablooms | Apr 05, 2022, at 08:14 pm

Islamabad/UNI: Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Umar Ata Bandial has asked the petitioners comprising the joint opposition parties to explain to the Supreme Court how the Apr 3 ruling by the national assembly deputy speaker Qasim Suri on the no-confidence resolution against the prime minister was illegal, Dawn reported on Tuesday.

Justice Munib Akhtar observed that, under the rules of the House, the deputy speaker went beyond his jurisdiction by issuing the ruling on the no-trust motion.

CJP Bandial, who was presiding over a five-judge larger bench which had taken up suo motu notice of the matter, as well as a number of petitions filed by various parties, observed that the question of illegality in the filing of the no-trust motion could have been addressed earlier, but once the leave of the house was granted meant the stage of raising objections had passed.

The CJP asked as to why opposition members failed to attend the meeting of the parliamentary committee on national security, during which contents of the 'threat letter' were shared with parliamentarians.

Former law minister Senator Farooq H Naek, representing the PPP, PML-N and JUI-F in a joint petition, highlighted the urgency of the matter and requested the court to wrap up the case on Monday since President Dr Arif Alvi had issued a notification requiring Imran Khan to continue as interim prime minister under Article 224A(4) of the Constitution.

However, the case was adjourned until Tuesday, when PPP Senator Raza Rabbani and senior counsel Makhdoom Ali Khan will present their arguments and the court is likely to announce its decision.

On Mar 25, the deputy speaker summoned the session and adjourned it till Mar 28 when the no-trust motion was submitted and leave was granted by the deputy speaker and voting on the motion was fixed for Apr 3.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.