March 28, 2025 05:34 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
3 cops killed, 2 terrorists shot dead during J&K's Kathua encounter: Report | Kolkata couple sues IVF centre for not revealing daughter's biological parents' identity, blames it for her death | 'India is not Dharamshala', Amit Shah says as Lok Sabha passes Immigration and Foreigners Bill 2025 | 'Now it's our turn': Vladimir Putin accepts Narendra Modi's invitation to visit India | Gold smuggling case: Kannada actor Ranya Rao’s bail plea rejected again | Congress workers clash with police in Odisha during protest against suspension of MLAs | Parvesh Verma and Atishi engage in war of words over 'bhai' comment in Delhi assembly | 'I am amused': Sitharaman on Raghav Chadha’s banking remarks, urges him to use ‘Western exposure’ for India | Mumbai Police denies Kunal Kamra more time to appear, issues second summons despite 'threat to life' claim | Political black comedy at its darkest: MK Stalin counters Yogi Adityanath on language row
Image Credit : PIB

Samajwadi Party MP demands Sengol to be replaced by Constitution in Lok Sabha

| @indiablooms | Jun 27, 2024, at 10:50 pm

New Delhi: Samajwadi Party MP RK Chaudhary triggered controversy by calling for the Sengol, a historic sceptre, to be replaced with the Constitution in the Lok Sabha, media reported.

This demand drew criticism from the BJP and other NDA allies.

In a letter to pro-tem Speaker Bhartruhari Mahtab, RK Chaudhary described the Sengol as an "anachronistic symbol of monarchy" in a democratic India.

According to an India Today report, Chaudhary explained the logic behind his claim,  saying, "Sengol means 'Raj Dand'. It also means 'Raja ka Danda'. After ending the princely order, the country became independent. Will the country be run by 'Raja ka danda' or the Constitution? I demand that Sengol be removed from Parliament to save the Constitution."

The Sengol, placed in the Lok Sabha during the inauguration of the new Parliament building last year, was originally given to India's first Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru, as a symbol of the transfer of power from the British to Indians.

Chaudhary's comments were met with backlash from the BJP, which accused the Samajwadi Party of being "hell-bent" on insulting an essential aspect of Indian and Tamil culture.

"If it was a symbol of monarchy, then why did the first Prime Minister Nehru accept it? Was he accepting that symbol and monarchy," said BJP spokesperson Shehzad Poonawalla, the report said.

Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath slammed the INDIA bloc, claiming that their stance demonstrated the alliance's disdain for Tamil culture.

"The Samajwadi Party has no respect for Indian history or culture. The remarks of their top leaders on the Sengol are condemnable and indicate their ignorance. It also shows INDI alliance's hatred to Tamil culture in particular," Adityanath tweeted.

LJP (Ram Vilas) MP Chirag Paswan also came down heavily, accusing Congress and Congress-led governments of always trying to misrepresent historical symbols.

"These people cannot do positive politics... These people only do politics of division," he said.

As the controversy flared, Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav, shielding Chaudhary from criticism, said the MP was just attempting to draw attention to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who did not bow before the Sengol after taking oath in the Lok Sabha.

"I think our MP might be saying that because when it (Sengol) was installed, the PM had bowed before it. He perhaps forgot it while taking oath... When the PM forgot to bow before it, maybe he too wanted something else," ANI quoted AKhilesh Yadav as saying.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.
Close menu