April 20, 2025 11:39 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Narendra Modi to visit Saudi Arabia next week, deepening multi-faceted partnership on agenda | Trump says US will 'take a pass' on Russia-Ukraine peace talks if parties make it difficult | Andhra student dies in accident in US' Texas days before her graduation | Karnataka students allegedly forced to remove sacred threads at CET exam centre, sparks outrage | Bengal BJP leader Dilip Ghosh marries party colleague Rinku Majumdar in an intimate ceremony today | Narendra Modi, Elon Musk discuss Indo-US tech collaboration | 'Focus on protecting rights of own minorities': India slams Bangladesh's remark on Murshidabad riots | Gangster Harpreet Singh, alias Happy Passia, responsible for Punjab terror attacks arrested in US | No change in 'waqf by user' for now till next hearing: Supreme Court to Centre | Supreme Court rules Bengal govt teachers 'not identified as tainted' in SSC scam can continue till fresh appointments

SC adjourns Ayodhya case, will announce hearing dates in January

| @indiablooms | Oct 29, 2018, at 12:24 pm

New Delhi, Oct 29 (IBNS): The Supreme Court on Monday adjourned the case, which pertains to whether Ram temple can be built in the disputed land of Uttar Pradesh's Ayodhya, till January, when it will announce the hearing dates, media reports said.

The top court will hear pleas challenging Allahabad High Court's verdict which divided 2.77-acre disputed Ayodhya land among Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board and Nirmohi Akhara.

The case will be taken up by a new bench excluding Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi, NDTV reported.

The apex court will decide whether Ram temple can be built in the same disputed land, where Babri Masjid was held till 1992.

In 1992, the Babri Masjid was brought down by several right-wing volunteers who believe Lord Ram was born at that land.

The verdict, if passed prior to 2019 General Elections, will boost up the BJP, whose political commitment was building the Ram temple in Ayodhya.

On Sept 27, the apex court had refused to re-visit its 1994 verdict which had stated mosque was not important for Muslims to offer prayers, paving way for the hearing of the Ayodhya case.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.
Close menu