May 03, 2025 03:07 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Pahalgam attack: Supreme Court stays deportation of PoK-born man, his family with Indian passports | Cops charge OTT show's host Ajaz Khan, producer Rajkymar Pandey over 'sex positions' viral clip | 7.4 magnitude earthquake strikes off coast of Chile and Argentina, tsunami warning issued | PM Modi inaugurates Vizhinjam International Seaport in Kerala worth Rs. 8,800 crore | 'Many will get their sleep disturbed': Modi's veiled jibe at Congress over Shashi Tharoor, Pinarayi Vijayan's presence at Kerala event | Kashmir: Pakistani soldiers violate ceasefire for 8th consecutive night along LoC | Hope India's response to Pahalgam attack doesn't lead to broader regional conflict: JD Vance | Pahalgam attack: JD Vance says US hopes Pakistan will cooperate with India in hunting down terrorists | Shashi Tharoor welcomes PM Modi in Kerala, takes dig at 'dysfunctional' Delhi airport over flight delays | Air India will see a $600 million loss with Pakistan banning its airspace after Pahalgam attack: Report

SC defers final hearing of Ayodhya case till Feb 8

| | Dec 05, 2017, at 09:55 pm

New Delhi, Dec 5 (IBNS) : The Supreme Court  on Tuesday deferred the final hearinng in the long-pending Ayodhya-Ram Janambhoomi case till Febuary 8, 2018 after a specially constituted bench sat  a day before the 25th anniversary of Babri Masjid demolition, reports said.

 A three-judge Supreme Court bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices Ashok Bhushan and Abdul Nazeer will hear  the case.

The dispute was triggered after the 16th Century mosque – Babri Masjid – was demolished by thousands of activists associated with right wing groups on December 6, 1992.

The specially constituted Supreme Court bench will hear a total of 13 appeals filed against the 2010 judgement of the Allahabad High Court in four civil suits.

The High court, in 2010, had decided that the disputed land of 2.77 acre will be divided in three-way among the parties — the Sunni Waqf Board, the Nirmohi Akhara, and the Lord Ram Lalla.  The court ordered each party a third of the land at the site. After that the stakeholders in the case had moved the apex court.

Calling the verdict "strange, the Supreme Court,  in May 2011,  stayed the operation of the order. It observed that the  decree of partition was not sought by the parties… not prayed by anyone”.

Recently a group of civil rights activists also  moved the apex court seeking intervention in the Ayodhya dispute and urged it to consider the issue saying it is not just a dispute over property but has several other aspects which would have far-reaching effects on the “secular fabric of the country”.


Key words : SupremeCourt,FinalHearing,AyodhyaCase,RamJanamBhoomi,BabriMasjid

after the Allahabad High Court directed the Sunni Waqf Board, the Nirmohi Akhara and the Lord Ram Lalla to settle for a three-way division of the 2.77-acre disputed site.
 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.
Close menu