April 21, 2025 08:07 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Pope Francis, first Latin-American head of Catholic church, dies at 88 | Murshidabad violence: Supreme Court slams petitioner over irresponsible averments in plea | Family of Murshidabad riots victims decline Mamata Banerjee's compensation | Narendra Modi to visit Saudi Arabia next week, deepening multi-faceted partnership on agenda | Trump says US will 'take a pass' on Russia-Ukraine peace talks if parties make it difficult | Andhra student dies in accident in US' Texas days before her graduation | Karnataka students allegedly forced to remove sacred threads at CET exam centre, sparks outrage | Bengal BJP leader Dilip Ghosh marries party colleague Rinku Majumdar in an intimate ceremony today | Narendra Modi, Elon Musk discuss Indo-US tech collaboration | 'Focus on protecting rights of own minorities': India slams Bangladesh's remark on Murshidabad riots

SC refuses to hear PIL seeking checking of 100 per cent VVPAT slips

| @indiablooms | May 21, 2019, at 01:28 pm

New Delhi, May 21 (IBNS): The Supreme Court on Tuesday refused to hear a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking a 100 per cent matching of Voter-verified paper audit trail (VVPAT) slips with Electronic Voting Machines (EMVs) while counting of votes for Lok Sabha polls on May 23, media reports said.

A vacation bench headed by Justice Arun Mishra refused to entertain the plea which has already been dismissed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Ranjan Gogoi.

On May 7, the Supreme Court rejected 21 anti-ruling parties' request to increase the counting of VVPAT machines from five to 25 per cent in the recently concluded Lok Sabha elections.

A bench of the apex court, headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Ranjan Gogoi, dismissed the review petitions.

On Apr 8, the Election Commission had argued during a hearing that the poll results will be delayed by five days if 50 per cent of total VVPATs are counted.

In its judgement, the Supreme Court had then increased the counting of paper trail machines from one to five, which didn't satisfy the club of opposition parties that had filed a review plea.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.
Close menu