July 26, 2026 06:21 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'Victory of democracy': Sonam Wangchuk congratulates Gen Z as Dharmendra Pradhan resigns after month-long NEET protests | 'Democracy has triumphed': CJP celebrates as Dharmendra Pradhan quits, warns Centre 'Don't mess with cockroaches' | Centre buckles under CJP-led NEET protests; Dharmendra Pradhan quits as Education Minister | Delhi Police flags 2,500 suspected criminals at Jantar Mantar amid NEET protest | 'No assurances, sack Dharmendra Pradhan': CJP fires back at PM Modi over NEET row | 'Don't insult students': Rahul Gandhi tears into PM Modi's midnight NEET video, demands Dharmendra Pradhan's exit | Trump slaps fresh tariffs on India, China and 58 others over forced labour concerns | Sonam Wangchuk ends 26-day hunger strike after 'long negotiations', urges CJP protesters to maintain peace | PM Modi promises fresh steps on paper leaks in late night video | NEET protest: Centre invites CJP for talks; protesters stick to Jantar Mantar or neutral venue demand

SC sends notice to Salman Khan regarding acquittal in hit-and-run case

| | Feb 19, 2016, at 09:17 pm
Mumbai, Feb 19 (IBNS) The Supreme Court (SC) sent a notice to actor Salman Khan on Friday asking why his acquittal by the Bombay High Court in the 2002 hit-and-run case should not be overturned, according to media reports.

SC was hearing a petition made by the Maharashtra government where it has challenged the verdict issued by the Bombay High Court in 2015.

SC has also issued a notice in response to a petition by the victim's family that they have not received any compensation, according to local reports.

On Sep 28, 2002, Salman Khan's Toyota Land Cruiser had crashed into men sleeping on the pavement in a Bandra neighbourhood.

In May 2015, a trial court had held Khan guilty of running over the man after a night out drinking.

In Dec 2015, the Bombay High Court had said that the prosecution had failed to prove "beyond reasonable doubt" that the actor was driving the vehicle at the time of the accident and was drunk, according to media reports.

Senior lawyer Kapil Sibbal, appearing for the actor on Friday, said there is not evidence that Khan was driving the car when the incident occurred.

SC has given the actor six weeks to respond to the notice.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.