September 24, 2026 03:59 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
ECI breaks silence on SIR row: Poll body says all decisions were ‘unanimous’ despite differences | Gyanesh Kumar under fire: Opposition seeks CEC’s removal as SIR row explodes over report of 14 internal ECI objections | SIR row explodes: Report claims 14 objections by 2 Election Commissioners; Opposition demands CEC Gyanesh Kumar's removal | IIT Bombay professor Suryanarayana Doolla sent on leave amid Sahil Wakode death controversy: Report | Narendra Modi's Canada visit confirmed: Carney eyes trade deal by year-end | 'When we win, we're tearing this down': MAGA activist's threat to 90-foot Hanuman statue in US sparks backlash | Delhi women's safety under spotlight: 17-year-old allegedly gang-raped near Kalkaji Mandir in fourth such incident in 10 days | India gets fresh push for permanent UNSC seat as 4 European nations back bid | IIT Bombay professor gets faculty backing after student death controversy; protests intensify over suspension | IIT Bombay protests erupt after student’s death; authorities meet students over 18 demands

SC strikes down Section 66A of IT Act

| | Mar 24, 2015, at 04:50 pm
New Delhi, Mar 24 (IBNS): In a significant development, the Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down the Section 66A of IT Act.

The apex court hold the section violative of 19(1) A of the Constitution which guarantees the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression to citizens.

The verdict on the issue was pronounced by a bench of Justices J Chelameswar and Rohinton F Nariman.

Under this section, the police had the power to arrest people for posting objectionable content online.

In this case, a conviction can give a maximum of three years in jail.

The validity of the section was challenged by a law student Shreya Singal and others.

After the apex court pronounced its verdict, Shreya Singhal said: It a big victory...The judges have upheld the rights of the citizens today."

"It has been misused. One needs to remember that the law should be for the people," she said.

Another petitioner, Bangladeshi writer

Taslima Nasreen tweeted: "A censorship ruling by the Supreme Court today could change the way the internet works for you."

 

Image: Wikimedia Commons

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.