September 10, 2026 09:57 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
After days of silence, China confirms Xi Jinping’s India visit for BRICS Summit | Big setback for Abhishek Banerjee as CID arrests aide Sumit Roy | Firebrand Tukaram Mundhe’s Food Safety Blitz Hits ISKCON Juhu, 3 Licences Suspended | Vande Mataram row erupts in INDIA bloc: Congress objects, ally NC hits back, BJP pounces | Ahmedabad horror: Woman allegedly killed by father, brother to preserve ‘family honour’ over viral photo with male friend | MEA distances itself from Eiffel Tower-BAPS row, says dispute is ‘between entities concerned’ | Eiffel Tower staff strike after female workers 'sidelined' during Hindu group visit | ‘When will character assassination of women stop?’ Kangana Ranaut amid Udhayanidhi-Trisha row | 11 arms instead of 10! Suvendu Adhikari apologises over Durga image in Bengal govt ad amid Bageshwar Baba row | ‘Meat is core to Shakta Hinduism’: PM Modi adviser hits back at Bageshwar Baba over non-veg ban appeal
Image Credit: UNI Photo

SC to decide on Rafale verdict review on Feb 26

| @indiablooms | Feb 22, 2019, at 11:05 pm

New Delhi, Feb 22 (IBNS): Supreme Court on Tuesday will decide on petitions whether its December 14, 2018 verdict of giving the Centre a clean chit on the Rafale deal should be reviewed, media reports said.

A bench of Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi and Justices L. Nageswara Rao and Sanjiv Khanna had conveyed to advocate Prashant Bhushan on Thursday that it would look into requests to hear review petitions against the verdict.

Apart from Bhushan, former Union ministers Arun Shourie and Yashwant Sinha had sought a review of the apex court judgment in the case saying the Supreme Court had been misled with "incorrect claims" made by the Centre.

Reports said the hearing would be conducted in the chambers and not in open court.

In its December order, the Supreme Court had said it found no reason to justify the corruption allegations in the case.

"There is no evidence of commercial favouritism to any private entity," the court had said.

 

 

Image Credit: UNI Photo
 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.