September 17, 2026 02:10 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Gurugram biker crash: Main accused Kalyan Bainsla sent to police custody for 2 days | ‘Just tax collection’: Ashneer Grover slams new UPI charges above Rs 2,000 | India condemns Houthi attack on Saudi Arabia, warns of threat to Red Sea shipping | Gurugram biker hit by car: Two including main accused arrested after viral road rage video, attempt to murder case filed | Gurugram horror caught on camera: ‘I felt unsafe’—car chases, rams woman biker and flees | BRICS veg menu row: ‘Why shouldn’t we showcase it?’—Harsh Goenka hits back after Rahul Gandhi’s ‘80%’ remark | India-UAE Comprehensive Strategic Partnership in focus: Modi meets Abu Dhabi Crown Prince on BRICS sidelines | Xi Jinping lands in India for BRICS; big Modi meeting set for New Delhi | ‘Hospitality on another level’: South African official stunned by India’s BRICS hosting | Suvendu Adhikari eats fish bhog at Kalighat Temple amid Bageshwar Baba row

Shaheen Bagh impasse: Mediators report back

| @indiablooms | Feb 24, 2020, at 03:17 pm

New Delhi/UNI: Interlocutors on Monday submitted a detailed report, in a sealed cover, to the Supreme Court in connection with petitions challenging an agitation at Shaheen Bagh area against the Citizenship Amendment Act, which is seen as anti-Muslim.

" We will go through the report and hear the matter day after tomorrow," ruled a bench, headed by Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul.

Apex Court will now hear the matter on Wednesday, February 26, after examining the report.

There are two petitions challenging the Shaheen Bagh agitation where protestors are opposing the CAA notification of the Centre.

The stir which has blocked an arterial road in south Delhi is two months plus. 

 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.