April 05, 2026 10:25 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
‘Not denied a ticket’: Annamalai explains absence from BJP’s Tamil Nadu candidate list | ‘Ghar-wapsi soon’: PoK wants to return to India, claims Imam organisation chief | Kerala polls shocker: Tharoor’s convoy stopped, security guard attacked mid-campaign | AAP drops Raghav Chadha from key parliamentary role, sparks buzz over internal rift | Amit Shah to camp in West Bengal for 15 days during Assembly polls; predicts Mamata’s defeat in state and Bhabanipur | 'BJP plotting President’s Rule, don’t fall in the trap': Mamata Banerjee on Malda unrest, urges peace | 'Most polarised state': CJI Kant raps Bengal govt over 9-hour hostage of judicial officers | Bengal SIR protest: Judge pleads for help amid mob attack after 9-hour hostage ordeal | Bengal SIR progress: 47 lakh of 60 lakh adjudicated cases disposed of, Supreme Court informed | Amit Shah to join Suvendu Adhikari on Bhabanipur nomination day; BJP plans mega roadshow

SP chief Akhilesh Yadav accuses Speaker's rights being curtailed; Amit Shah slams him

| @indiablooms | Aug 08, 2024, at 10:55 pm

New Delhi: Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav on Thursday accused the government of narrowing the scope of the rights of Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla and asserted that the Opposition would have to protect his rights, eliciting a sharp retort from Home Minister Amit Shah.

"Your rights and our rights are being curtailed. I had told you that you are the judge of democracy. I have heard that some of your rights are being snatched and we would have to fight for you," the Kannauj MP said during the debate on the Waqf (Amendment) Bill in Lok Sabha, reported NDTV.

Union Home Minister Amit Shah opposed Yadav's allegations, stating that the Speaker belonged to the whole house and not just the opposition.

"This is an insult to the Chair. The rights of the Speaker do not belong to the Opposition, but to the whole House. Don't speak in a roundabout way. You are not the protector of the Speaker's rights," Shah said, according to the report.

Later, Birla told Akhilesh Yadav that he and other members of the House must not remark on the Chair. "This is my expectation, no personal remarks should be made on the Chair," he said.

Yadav lashed out at the legislation, alleging that it was a well thought out political move. "When there is a democratic process for election, why nominate people? No person from outside the community is part of other religious bodies. What is the point of including non-Muslims in Waqf bodies?" he said.

He claimed that the BJP had brought this law to appease some hardline supporters after losing a substantial number of seats in the Lok Sabha election.

Opposition parties have united to challenge a new piece of legislation designed to tackle issues concerning the authority of State Waqf Boards, the registration and survey of Waqf properties, and the removal of encroachments.

The proposed legislation seeks to amend 44 sections of the 1995 Waqf Act. It suggests that both the Central Waqf Council and state Waqf Boards include two women members.

It also mandates that funds received by the Waqf Board be allocated for the welfare of widows, divorcees, and orphans as directed by the government.

Another significant proposal is the protection of women's inheritance rights. The bill also introduces the controversial idea of including non-Muslim members in Waqf bodies.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.