September 17, 2026 11:19 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Married just 17 days ago: Hyderabad engineer mysteriously found dead at US home | ‘We will promote cash’: New UPI charge triggers trader backlash, Opposition protests | Gurugram biker crash: Main accused Kalyan Bainsla sent to police custody for 2 days | ‘Just tax collection’: Ashneer Grover slams new UPI charges above Rs 2,000 | India condemns Houthi attack on Saudi Arabia, warns of threat to Red Sea shipping | Gurugram biker hit by car: Two including main accused arrested after viral road rage video, attempt to murder case filed | Gurugram horror caught on camera: ‘I felt unsafe’—car chases, rams woman biker and flees | BRICS veg menu row: ‘Why shouldn’t we showcase it?’—Harsh Goenka hits back after Rahul Gandhi’s ‘80%’ remark | India-UAE Comprehensive Strategic Partnership in focus: Modi meets Abu Dhabi Crown Prince on BRICS sidelines | Xi Jinping lands in India for BRICS; big Modi meeting set for New Delhi
Mathua
Photo courtesy: UNI

Supreme Court dismisses plea for removal of Shahi Idgah Mosque in Mathura

| @indiablooms | Jan 05, 2024, at 08:33 pm

New Delhi/UNI: The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) petition seeking removal of Mathura's Shahi Idgah Mosque.

A bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta refused to entertain the appeal filed against an order of the Allahabad High Court which had dismissed the PIL.

"It would not be right for us to interfere. Sorry. Not a matter for PIL", said the Supreme Court, saying it’s a dispute on questions of fact. The court clarified that the petition will not come in the way of any future application.

The Allahabad High Court had in October 2023 rejected the PIL filed by advocate Mahek Maheshwari seeking to recognise Mathura’s Shahi Idgah Mosque as the site of Krishna Janambhoomi (Birthplace of Lord Krishna)

The petitioner cited various historical texts and said, “It is a documented fact that the site is Krishna Janambhoomi and its historical roots could be traced back to the Ramayana era."

The petitioner argued that since Islam has arrived much later than the Ramayana period, the structure cannot be treated as a mosque.

The petitioner urged the court to transfer the land where Shahi Idgah Mosque is situated to the Hindu community. A legitimate trust could be established for the Krishna Janambhoomi Janamsthan which would construct the temple, the petitioner had suggested.

The petitioner said the Shahi Idgah does not qualify for the status of a legitimate mosque under Islamic jurisprudence since a mosque cannot be constructed on land acquired through force.

On the other hand, according to Hindu jurisprudence, a temple retains its sacred status even if it lies in ruins, the petitioner said.

The plea also asked for a court-monitored excavation using GPRS technology by the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) at the disputed site to ascertain whether the Mosque was constructed over Krishna Janmasthan.

The High Court had dismissed the case after noting that the reliefs sought were already pending consideration before the High Court in related suits. This led to the appeal before the apex court.

A civil suit is already pending before a trial court seeking similar reliefs.

All three courts, the trial court in Uttar Pradesh, the Allahabad High Court, and the Supreme Court had rejected the Hindu Trust's plea for a scientific survey of the disputed site.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.