September 28, 2026 04:23 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Vijay's TVK makes Bengal entry: First party office opens in Purba Bardhaman amid state's political shake-up | SRFTI clash erupts over ABGP event: Students allege assault; BJP calls it ‘ugly face of Leftists’ | 'Asif bhai gun nikal': 17-year-old's chilling account of men posing as cops raping her in South Delhi park | Indian passport rules changed: New validity, fees for children and adults explained | 'Terrorism by Pakistan will have consequences': India issues blunt warning at UNGA | Trouble for Gyanesh Kumar? Plea filed in Supreme Court seeking prosecution of CEC | Air India pilot suspended after failing alcohol test before Zurich-Delhi flight, weeks after marijuana case | 'Don't be selective, boycott all elections': CJP's Abhijeet Dipke's blunt message to Opposition | 'Resign by tomorrow or face nationwide protest from October 2': CJP's Abhijeet Dipke's fresh warning to Gyanesh Kumar | 'Locked' iPhone 17 at centre of mystery surrounding IIT Bombay student's death
Supreme Court

Supreme Court dismisses plea seeking clarification in Shaheen Bagh judgement

| @indiablooms | Jan 25, 2022, at 01:51 am

New Delhi/UNI: The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed an application seeking certain clarification in the Shaheen Bagh judgement, delivered by the apex court earlier.

"The judgement is self-speaking and no clarification is required, such applications are not maintainable," the Bench of the Apex Court, headed by Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and also comprising Justice M M Sundresh, said, and dismissed the application filed by Syed Bahadur Abbas Naqvi, an intervenor in the main matter.

The Supreme Court had delivered the judgement in an appeal filed by Advocate Amit Sahni, seeking to remove the protests against the Citizenship Amendment-National Register of Citizens (CAA-NRC) at Shaheen Bagh, alleging that the protests were blocking the roads, affecting the right of free movement of the public.

Though the protesters vacated the site in March with the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic, the apex court had proceeded to hear the matter on the larger issue of balancing the right to protest with the right to free movement of people.

"The issue is over, why is it listed? What's the clarification sought I don't understand. There's no clarification required. The whole issue is over. Sorry. No clarification of a judgement. The judgement speaks for itself. Dismissed," the Supreme Court said and rejected the application filed by Syed Bahadur Abbas Naqvi, who was an intervenor in the main matter.

"We have dismissed this application, there is no need for clarification, and the judgement has been passed, such an application is not maintainable, we are not going to entertain such applications in disposed of matters." Justice Kaul told the Counsel, appearing for Naqvi.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.