April 19, 2026 02:28 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Pushback from smartphone makers: Centre drops Aadhaar app pre-install plan — report | Meta eyes first wave of layoffs on May 20: Report | TCS breaks silence on Nida Khan: ‘No HR role, no power’ in Nashik case | ‘Panic reaction’: Rahul Gandhi on women’s bill, says PM Modi ‘wants to send a message’ | Adani Group shares rise as Gautam Adani becomes Asia’s richest, overtakes Mukesh Ambani | TCS Nashik ‘conversion’ case accused seeks anticipatory bail citing pregnancy | IT raids TMC candidate Debasish Kumar’s premises ahead of Bengal polls | Bengal SIR: Supreme Court allows voters restored by tribunal till April 21 and 27 to vote | 'Women won't spare you': PM Modi warns Opposition over resistance to quota bill | Vijay booked in 3 cases over poll code violation ahead of Tamil Nadu polls
Uttar Pradesh
Photo Courtesy: Wikimedia Commons/ShareAlike 4.0 International

Supreme Court issues notice on plea challenging UP government's ban on halal-certified products

| @indiablooms | Jan 06, 2024, at 10:45 pm

The Supreme Court on Friday issued a notice on a plea that challenged the UP government's notification that puts a complete ban on the sale, storage and distribution of Halal-certified products in the east Indian state.

A bench of Justices BR Gavai and Sandeep Mehta issued notice to the Centre and Uttar Pradesh Government on the plea filed by Halal India Private Limited and Jamiat Ulama-e-Maharashtra challenging the ban imposed by the Uttar Pradesh Government in November last year, reported India Today.

The petitioner contended that the ban violated the citizens' fundamental rights and undermined established certification processes.

Senior Advocate Siddharth Aggarwal and Raju Ramachandran told the bench that the ban has wide ramifications, including interstate trade, and said as quoted by India Today, "This ban has a pan-India effect and affects a community across the country and therefore has national implication. There is an immediate effect on interstate trade and industry, and on the consumer."

The bench declined to pass any interim relief into the matter.

The bench said the matter will be considered at a later stage.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.