September 03, 2026 10:14 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Supreme Court slams Bar Council of India over NALSAR row: ‘No power to take action against law students’ | ‘Technical error, not U-turn’: Kerala CM Satheesan denies deleting video slamming cleric’s women remarks after Islamic Scholars’ meet | Bombay HC orders CBI probe into Sushant Singh Rajput's ex-manager Disha Salian's death case | Vijay for PM in 2029? TVK says Rahul Gandhi will ‘hold his hand’ to make him Prime Minister | CJP calls off Sept 5 Delhi march after Supreme Court quashes FIRs against protesters | ‘Dismantle entire terror ecosystem’: Modi’s strong message at SCO Summit in Shehbaz’s presence | Modi’s big appeal after 7.8% GDP growth: ‘Don’t travel abroad, avoid destination weddings’ | Modi-Pezeshkian talks: Iran seeks India’s 'extensive contacts' to end West Asia war | Indus Waters Treaty row: India rejects Hague court order, says ‘no jurisdiction’ over its sovereign decisions | India beats the odds with 7.8% GDP growth; PM Modi has a message for critics
Sedition Law

Supreme Court pauses controversial sedition law until review in historic verdict

| @indiablooms | May 11, 2022, at 07:24 pm

New Delhi/IBNS: In a historic judgement, the Supreme Court Wednesday paused colonial era's controversial sedition law until its review by the government, media reports said.

After the verdict, now hundreds who are charged under the law can now approach court for bail.

Responding to the pleas which challenged the law alleging its misuse in many cases, the top court said no new First Information Report (FIR) will be filed and all pending cases will be hold at a time the government reviews the Act. 

Chief Justice of India (CJI) NV Ramana said as quoted by NDTV, "It will be appropriate not to use this provision of law till further re-examination is over.

"We hope and expect that centre and state will desist from registering any FIR under 124 A (sedition law) or initiate proceeding under the same till re-examination is over."

"The Union of India is at liberty to pass directives to states to prevent misuse of the law," the CJI added. 

Though the government Monday announced its decision to review the law, it had argued that the Act should not be paused. 

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, who was representing the government, said as quoted by NDTV, "There has to be a layer of scrutiny, where a responsible officer is there to scrutinise the gravity of the situation and there of course would be judicial forums."

Welcoming the order, Congresss spokesperson Randeep Singh Surjewala, tweeted, "Speaking “truth to power” is not #Sedition but true Nationalism!.."

Calling the judgement "victory", Trinamool Congress (TMC) MP Mahua Moitra tweeted, "Supreme Court stays Sec 124A- no new cases can be filed, existing cases can apply for bail & release immediately.

"Thank you to my lawyer Sr. Advocate Gopal Sankaranarayan for his 1 pager which swung the day!"

 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.