May 11, 2026 11:04 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Big defence boost: India successfully tests advanced Agni MIRV missile | India, Singapore unite for tough action against terror and transnational crime | TVK crosses majority mark with VCK, IUML support | I bow before Bengal: PM Modi’s powerful gesture at Suvendu Adhikari’s oath goes viral | Bengal turns a new page: Suvendu Adhikari takes oath as CM amid massive NDA show of strength | Cloud over Tamil Nadu government formation as Governor asks Vijay to prove majority | 1 Year of Operation Sindoor: PM Modi says it showed India’s firm response to terror | ‘Larger conspiracy ahead of PM Modi’s visit’: BJP on killing of Suvendu Adhikari’s aide | ‘My car was on OLX for sale’: Siliguri owner says number plate used in Suvendu aide assassination may have been cloned online | ‘Pre-planned political assassination’: BJP’s Swapan Dasgupta on Suvendu aide’s killing

Supreme Court refuses to stay parliament's amendments to SC/ST Act

| @indiablooms | Jan 25, 2019, at 02:29 pm

New Delhi, Jan 25 (IBNS): The Supreme Court on Thursday refused to stay amendments, which were passed by the parliament last year, to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act which diluted the provision of an anticipatory bail for a person who committed atrocities against the community, media reports said.

The amendment, which was passed in August last year, overturned a Supreme Court's order which had ruled public servants cannot be detained after a complaint filed against them.

The top court said it will hear the Centre's petition against its March 20, 2018 order and pleas filed against the parliament's amendments together.

In April 2018, at least 11 people died and hundreds were arrested during the protests against the apex court's order.

After the amendments, no preliminary inquiry will now be required to lodge a case against an accused who can be arrested without any approval.

The petitions claimed that the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha, the two houses of the parliament, have arbitrarily amended the law, doing away with the provision which had earlier allowed a person to take an anticipatory bail.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.