August 16, 2026 02:27 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
After SC rebuke, BCI chief apologises to NALSAR students over enrolment freeze row | Independence Day: PM Modi’s big youth pitch— AI training, free coaching amid exam row and job concerns | ‘Shakti Ki Saptadhara’: Modi reveals 7 pillars to power India’s next leap in his I-Day speech from Red Fort | West Bengal STF arrests 3 more suspected Pakistani spies in Cooch Behar | Bengal man arrested in Bengaluru over terror links, Afghanistan travel plan | Ajit Doval breaks silence on Operation Sindoor in Discovery’s explosive new docuseries | Rahul Gandhi's 'mock hug' taunt sparks row; Centre stresses 'mutual respect' with Italy | Delhi on high alert: Bomb threat to High Court, airport and multiple locations ahead of I-Day | ‘Who are they to interfere?’: CJI Surya Kant slams Bar Council of India over NALSAR students’ enrolment row | 'Shows how low Congress has sunk': BJP slams Rahul Gandhi over Modi foreign policy jibe
Trump has repeatedly suggested that Biden govt wanted 'someone else to get elected' in 2024 Lok Sabha elections. (Image Credit: PIB)

Washington Post says Trump’s claim of $21 million US funding for India’s voter turnout is false

| @indiablooms | Feb 23, 2025, at 12:16 am

The Washington Post has refuted former US President Donald Trump’s claim that $21 million was provided to India for "voter turnout," stating that no such program exists, reported India Today.

The American daily’s findings have given the Congress fresh ammunition to attack the BJP.

In its report titled How a false DOGE claim ignited a political firestorm in India, The Washington Post clarified that USAID had a $21 million contract for Bangladesh, not India, citing officials from the organisation.

The report supports a similar claim by The Indian Express, which earlier stated that India had received no USAID funding for any election-related project since 2008.

This report has been central to an ongoing political feud between the BJP and the Congress.

Congress spokesperson Pawan Khera seized upon the Washington Post’s findings, accusing the BJP and its supporters of spreading misinformation.

"In this latest expose on the so-called US funding to increase voter turnout in India, The Washington Post discovers that no such program existed and no such funding came in. For the BJP and its blind supporters, crow is part of their daily diet plan. Who else will eat crow following this comedy of errors?" Khera tweeted.

The controversy began when DOGE, led by Elon Musk, claimed that it had scrapped a $21 million grant to India intended to boost voter turnout.

This amount was said to be part of a $486 million payment to the Consortium for Elections and Political Process Strengthening (CEPPS), a USAID-backed coalition of non-profits.

The Washington Post, citing three sources familiar with US aid initiatives, reported that there was no program in India matching DOGE's claim.

"We were all shocked to see that claim from DOGE. We don't know anything about elections in India because we have never been involved," an official told the newspaper.

Another US official suggested that the Musk-led department may have been "conflating numbers" from different programs.

Meanwhile, Trump has repeatedly suggested that the Biden administration may have interfered in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections.

"Why do we need to spend USD 21 million for voter turnout in India? I guess they (the Biden administration) were trying to get somebody else elected. We have got to tell the Indian government," he said earlier this week.

Despite making the claim multiple times, Trump has yet to provide any evidence to support his allegation.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.