June 28, 2026 10:26 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Fresh paper leak rocks India: Maharashtra TET postponed a day before exam, over 4 lakh aspirants affected | Pune fort murder case: Siya Goyal's brother says family would have called off marriage if she had objected | Donald Trump gets a road named after him in India, says 'Thank You!' | Fresh setback for Gautam Adani? US judge asks DoJ to justify dropping criminal charges | Ram Mandir Trust chief Champat Rai resigns as alleged donation siphoning row escalates | Ram Mandir fund row deepens: 8 arrested days after BJP called allegations 'false narrative' | 'Who tied the hands of CBI?': Calcutta HC on RG Kar case; victim's mother, now BJP MLA, says she is 'deeply disturbed' | Construction comes to a standstill at nearly 700 Kolkata projects after Taratala warehouse tragedy kills 15 | World Cup shocker! Ecuador stun Germany 2-1, storm into Round of 32 | Iran-US conflict: Cargo vessel hit near Strait of Hormuz, UN agency pauses evacuation operations
Sonam Wangchuk
Sonam Wangchuk during Ladakh protests. Photo: Screen-grab/Sonam Wangchuk X video

‘We are in the AI era’: Supreme Court blasts Centre over ‘malicious’ Sonam Wangchuk transcript

| @indiablooms | Feb 17, 2026, at 11:16 am

New Delhi/IBNS: The Supreme Court of India on Monday pulled up the Centre over the detention of climate activist Sonam Wangchuk, observing that there appeared to be “a certain malice” in the transcription of his speech, media reports said.

The top court criticised the government after noting that the transcript of Wangchuk’s three-minute speech had been expanded into a document running seven to eight minutes.

The remarks came during the hearing of a habeas corpus plea filed by his wife, Gitanjali Angmo.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for Angmo, argued that several controversial phrases cited in the transcript — including “self-immolation of Ladakhis” and “overthrow the government” — were never spoken by Wangchuk.

Responding to the submissions, a bench comprising Justices Aravind Kumar and PB Varale questioned the authenticity of the transcription and asked the government to produce the original version of the speech.

Addressing Additional Solicitor General KM Nataraj, the bench said, as quoted by NDTV: “Mr Nataraj, we need the actual transcripts of these speeches. This is the basis on which the detention order is passed.”

The court further observed discrepancies between the transcript and the detention order, stating: “The tabular list you have filed, some of these things don’t even find a place in the detention order. There should be at least the correct transcript of what he says. There should not be a variance. If the speech is of three minutes and your transcription goes on for seven to eight minutes, there is certainly malice in that.”

When the ASG argued that the transcript had been prepared by the concerned department and that officials were “not experts,” the court responded sharply: “We are in the era of AI. Precision should be 98 per cent.”

Wangchuk was arrested for allegedly provoking a mob during protests demanding statehood for Ladakh. The agitation turned violent, resulting in the deaths of four protesters.

The protests were triggered in part by a hunger strike led by Wangchuk starting around September 10, 2025.

Additionally, two elderly protesters — 72-year-old Tsering Angchuk and 60-year-old Tashi Dolma — who had participated in an extended hunger strike, fell seriously ill and required hospitalisation.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.