July 10, 2026 08:56 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Indian techie allegedly kills wife in US, sends photo of her body to 'secret girlfriend' in India; arrested | 'I fled the city': Thane doctor quits after alleged assault by Shiv Sena leader | Sensex surges 500 points before losing steam, ends marginally higher after volatile trading session | US court drops charges against Indian-origin doctor who drove Tesla off 250-foot cliff with family | Dalal Street bleeds! Sensex tanks over 1,600 points after Trump declares Iran ceasefire 'over' | 'It's over': Trump says on ceasefire with Iran | PM Modi visits 1,000-year-old Prambanan Temple in Indonesia, shares majestic aerial view of the holy site | Baruipur minor rape-murder case: Key accused Pravash Mondal killed in encounter | 'We have been cheated': Egypt coach slams refereeing after Argentina match sparks controversy | From 0-2 to victory! Argentina stage miraculous comeback amid referee drama to crush Egypt's World Cup dream

Expert urges WHO to do more to protect people from toxic substances

| | May 21, 2015, at 02:54 pm
New York, May 21 (IBNS): The UN independent expert on the implications for human rights of the environmentally sound management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes on Wednesday urged the World Health Organization to “play a much larger, more active role” in protecting people from the negative impacts of toxic pollution.

“Far more effort and resources should be devoted worldwide to protect people from the negative health impacts of toxic pollution,” said Baskut Tuncak, the UN Special Rapporteur on human rights and hazardous substances and wastes.

Tuncak’s call comes as the WHO’s governing body, the World Health Assembly, is meeting in Geneva, Switzerland.

“WHO can play a much larger, more active role in preventing adverse health effects from pollution,” he said.

He added, “A tiny fraction of WHO’s proposed budget for the next two years is for environmental health, despite clear evidence of large-scale harm today and the likelihood of increased harm in the coming years.”

According to a press release, issued by his office, “an estimated 13 million deaths per year and about one quarter of global burden of disease, namely, the impact of health problems, are caused by environmental determinants of health such as pollution of air, water, land and others."

It also stated, "Pollution is the leading cause of death in low- and middle-income countries and poor women and children who live and work in the world’s most polluted environments are most affected.”

The Special Rapporteur reminded WHO member States that “nearly all countries have a legal obligation to realize the right of children to the highest attainable standard of health,” saying that environmental pollution has a disproportionate effect on children and the future generations.

“Despite increasing risk of negative health impacts from pollution, and global calls for increased resources, only 2.5 per cent of WHO’s proposed program budget for 2016-2017 is dedicated to ‘Health and Environment’ sub-category,” he said.

He added, “The amount of work WHO dedicates to monitoring and preventing harm from toxic pollution is disproportionately low, given the impacts of pollution on human rights.”

UN human rights experts are part of what it is known as the Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council, the general name of the independent fact-finding and monitoring mechanisms that address either specific country situations or thematic issues in all parts of the world.

The experts work on a voluntary basis; they are not UN staff and do not receive a salary for their work.

Photo: World Bank/Masaru Goto

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.