July 28, 2026 08:00 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Assam floods: Death toll stays at 68 as over 5.24 lakh continue to battle deluge | 'Probe is meaningless if responsibility isn't fixed': Supreme Court slams Delhi Police over CJP protest crackdown | 'No protester will be left alone': CJP claims Centre shared FIR withdrawal copies after midnight talks | Bihar cop suspended after viral AK-47 firing video during NEET protest crackdown | After Dharmendra Pradhan's exit, 'E20 Janta Party' emerges, demands Nitin Gadkari's resignation over fuel policy | 'Can't lathicharge people just because they are protesting': Supreme Court slams Delhi Police over NEET protest crackdown | 'Victory of democracy': Sonam Wangchuk congratulates Gen Z as Dharmendra Pradhan resigns after month-long NEET protests | 'Democracy has triumphed': CJP celebrates as Dharmendra Pradhan quits, warns Centre 'Don't mess with cockroaches' | Centre buckles under CJP-led NEET protests; Dharmendra Pradhan quits as Education Minister | Delhi Police flags 2,500 suspected criminals at Jantar Mantar amid NEET protest
Google
Photo Courtesy: File image by Gregory Varnum via Wikimedia Commons

Google, US Justice Dept wrap up closing arguments about whether search engine is a monopoly

| @indiablooms | May 04, 2024, at 08:35 pm

Washington/IBNS: American multinational technology company Google and the United States Department of Justice on Friday (May 3) made the final arguments over claims that the Alphabet, Google's parent unit, has unlawfully dominated web search and related advertising, in a case the US government contends could shape the “future of the internet", reports said.

According to reports, the fate of Google’s search business is now in the hands of US District Judge Amit Mehta, as he will now begin preparing to render a major decision on whether the tech giant's conduct broke civil antitrust law.

However, the judge did not indicate when he would rule, but according to experts, he could potentially order changes to Google's business practices.

The US Justice Department and plaintiff states wrapped up their closing arguments Thursday on Google’s alleged anticompetitive conduct in the general search market, and on Friday, the arguments were focused on the company's allegedly illegal conduct in search advertising, reports The Verge.

Meanwhile, Google was also under fire in a separate case for failing to retain chat messages that the Department of Justice (DoJ) believes could have been relevant to the case.

On Friday, District Judge Amit Mehta in Washington quizzed both sides for hours, investigating whether competitive platforms such as Meta’s Facebook and Instagram and ByteDance’s TikTok are competitive substitutes for search advertising dollars.

According to Reuters, District Judge Mehta said a central issue was platform “substitute-ability” for advertisers, which the court must resolve.

The Judge also questioned whether Google assesses competitors’ pricing before making its own adjustments, as the multinational tech corporation's advertising business is responsible for about three quarters of its revenue.

Meanwhile, the DoJ has hammered away at Google, contending the search engine giant is a monopolist that illegally abused its power to boost profits.

The matter started in October, 2020 after the DoJ along with 11 state Attorneys General filed a civil antitrust lawsuit against Google to stop it from unlawfully maintaining monopolies in the search and search advertising markets.

Later in December, three more states joined the suit against the tech giant.

The trial in the case began on Sept 12 last year.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.