July 10, 2026 02:34 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Indian techie allegedly kills wife in US, sends photo of her body to 'secret girlfriend' in India; arrested | 'I fled the city': Thane doctor quits after alleged assault by Shiv Sena leader | Sensex surges 500 points before losing steam, ends marginally higher after volatile trading session | US court drops charges against Indian-origin doctor who drove Tesla off 250-foot cliff with family | Dalal Street bleeds! Sensex tanks over 1,600 points after Trump declares Iran ceasefire 'over' | 'It's over': Trump says on ceasefire with Iran | PM Modi visits 1,000-year-old Prambanan Temple in Indonesia, shares majestic aerial view of the holy site | Baruipur minor rape-murder case: Key accused Pravash Mondal killed in encounter | 'We have been cheated': Egypt coach slams refereeing after Argentina match sparks controversy | From 0-2 to victory! Argentina stage miraculous comeback amid referee drama to crush Egypt's World Cup dream

Security Council urges effective steps to end tensions in South Sudan

| | Mar 25, 2015, at 02:13 pm
New York, Mar 25 (IBNS): The United Nations Security Council has voiced its “profound disappointment” at the failure of all parties in South Sudan to conclude an agreement that would bring the country closer to resolving its ongoing conflict and usher in a period of national unity and peace.

In a presidential statement, the 15-member body underscored “the seriousness and urgency” of the situation on the ground in South Sudan and reiterated its “strong condemnation” of the repeated violations of the Cessation of Hostilities Agreement, accepted and signed by both the Government and opposition forces last year.

Moreover, the Council reiterated its intent to impose any sanctions that may be appropriate in order to encourage all parties to accelerate efforts in forming a Transitional Government of National Unity and to “take effective and comprehensive steps” to end military operations and all acts of violence.

The statement, read out by Ambassador François Delattre of France, which holds the Council presidency for March, also reaffirmed the body’s “deep concern that the conflict has resulted in great human suffering,” and restated its “deep appreciation” for the “courageous actions” of the UN Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS) in protecting civilians.

“The Security Council further underscores the significant importance of fighting impunity and ensuring accountability for serious violations and abuses of human rights and violations of international humanitarian law in South Sudan, including those that may amount to war crimes and crimes against humanity,” the statement added.

The security situation in South Sudan has deteriorated steadily over the past year since political in-fighting between President Salva Kiir and his former Vice-President, Riek Machar, and their respective factions erupted in December 2013. The hostilities subsequently turned into a full-fledged conflict that sent nearly 100,000 civilians fleeing to UN bases around the country.

While the crisis has uprooted an estimated 1.9 million people and placed more than 7 million at risk of hunger and disease, a recent peace deal between the warring factions had fostered hope of a definitive end to the year-long conflict.

Currently, UN bases are sheltering over 110,000 internally displaced persons (IDPs) with an additional 1.5 million others displaced throughout the country and 500,000 outside the country.

In addition, the number of food-insecure civilians is slated to rise from the current 2.5 million as the country approaches its critical lean season.

Photo: UN Photo/Loey Felipe (file)

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.