July 29, 2026 10:58 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Farmers storm Bhopal! Traffic crippled as protest over MSP intensifies | Supreme Court gives clean chit to Manmohan Singh in coal block scam case two years after death, accepts CBI closure report | Rahul Gandhi's 'student, idiot, andhbhakt' remark sparks uproar in Lok Sabha during anti-paper leak bill debate | Assam flood death toll climbs to 75; Over 3 lakh still affected as relief efforts intensify | 'You are simply useless': Kangana Ranaut hits back at CJP's Saurav Das in fresh Instagram attack | Assam floods: Death toll stays at 68 as over 5.24 lakh continue to battle deluge | 'Probe is meaningless if responsibility isn't fixed': Supreme Court slams Delhi Police over CJP protest crackdown | 'No protester will be left alone': CJP claims Centre shared FIR withdrawal copies after midnight talks | Bihar cop suspended after viral AK-47 firing video during NEET protest crackdown | After Dharmendra Pradhan's exit, 'E20 Janta Party' emerges, demands Nitin Gadkari's resignation over fuel policy
Hunger
A woman in the eastern DR Congo, who was forced to flee her home, due to violence works on a smallholding. Photo: WFP/Benjamin Anguandia

Shocking truth: Ending world hunger would cost less than 1% of global military spending!

| @indiablooms | Nov 19, 2025, at 04:30 pm

Ending hunger by 2030 would cost just $93 billion a year — less than one per cent of the $21.9 trillion spent on military budgets over the past decade, according to the UN World Food Programme (WFP).

By 2026 a staggering 318 million people would face crisis levels of hunger or worse, more than double the figure recorded in 2019, the food agency reported in its 2026 Global Outlook.

International support for the world’s hungriest people is “slow, fragmented, and underfunded,” meaning that many living in the world’s trouble spots will likely be unable to receive sufficient help next year, underscored, WFP.

“The poorest pay the ultimate price,” said Amina Mohammed, UN Deputy Secretary-General. “When the elephants fight, it is the grass that suffers,” she added, quoting an African proverb that is often used to convey the idea that when powerful nations, organizations, or individuals, engage in conflict, it is the weak or innocent who bear the brunt of the suffering.

Around the world, that “grass” — the innocent civilians of Sudan, Gaza, Haiti, Yemen, the Sahel, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and so many other places — are suffering beyond measure.

Families are paying the price for wars they did not start, and for decisions made in rooms where their voices are never heard, the UN deputy chief said.

WFP, a critical lifeline

“WFP provides a critical lifeline to people on the frontlines of conflicts and weather disasters, as well as those forced to leave their homes, and we are transforming how we work to invest in long-term solutions to address food insecurity,” said WFP Executive Director Cindy McCain.

In 2026, the agency plans to assist 110 million vulnerable people at an estimated cost of $13 billion, providing emergency food, nutrition support, community resilience programmes, and technical assistance to strengthen national systems.

“The world is grappling with simultaneous famines in Gaza and parts of Sudan. This is completely unacceptable in the twenty-first century,” stressed McCain.

“Across the globe, hunger is becoming more entrenched. WFP has proven time and again that early, effective, and innovative solutions can save lives and change lives – but we desperately need more support to continue this vital work”.

Investing in climate adaptation, promoting peace, and supporting local markets, while ensuring women and young people have ownership and decision-making power, are among the key priorities crucial to ending world hunger, said Amina Mohammed.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.