September 20, 2026 04:27 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Arvind Kejriwal, family ‘missing’ from Delhi voter list, claims Aam Aadmi Party | ‘No UPI above ₹2,000?’ Ghaziabad traders put up ‘cash only’ hoardings | Trump signs Russia sanctions bill: India faces fresh 100% tariff threat over Moscow oil | Caught using ChatGPT for exam answers, IIT Bombay student dies by suicide; students protest | Congress' Nandigram candidate arrested after Mamata's support amid TMC symbol row; Bengal bypoll gets chaotic | Gurugram murder shocker: Groom-to-be leaves sisters at Delhi restaurant to meet ex-colleague, found dead days later | Delhi horror: Teen allegedly gangraped, stabbed to death and dumped in field; dogs eat parts of body | TMC name, symbol frozen: EC tells rival factions to pick new identities ahead of Bengal bypolls | Married just 17 days ago: Hyderabad engineer mysteriously found dead at US home | ‘We will promote cash’: New UPI charge triggers trader backlash, Opposition protests
Palghar Lynching

47 more accused in Palghar lynching granted bail

| @indiablooms | Dec 07, 2020, at 08:45 pm

Thane/UNI: A total of 47 of the arrested accused in the infamous Palghar lynching case were granted bail by the special court here on Monday.

Earlier the court had granted bail to four of the arrested accused taking the total of accused released on bail so far to 105. On earlier dates, the court had released 58 persons on bail.

The District Judge at the Special Court P P Jadhav in his order granted them bail with a surety of Rs 15,000 each.

There were a total of 201 persons arrested in the infamous case of whom 105 have been granted bail and the others are still in jail.

The court posted the next date for hearing as December 18.

Appearing for the applicants, Advocates Amrut Adhikari and Atul Patil submitted in the court that the applicants had no role to play in the said incident at all.

They were innocent and the police had arrested them on mere suspicion the applicants submitted in the court and sought bail.

The court had also rejected the bail application of 36 arrested accused in the crime on earlier dates, stating that their role in the crime was prima facie proved and hence they do not deserve bail.

The accused also questioned the validity of three FIRs being registered for one and the same incident which took place on the night of April 16.

Advocate Satish Maneshinde appeared for the prosecution while Advocate P N Ojha appeared for the family of victim sadhus. 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.